Patient satisfaction and quality of life of home enteral nutrition clients
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
The following data were analysed at the initiation of HEN: age, sex, pathology, Karnofsky index, type of enteral access device, presence of pressure ulcers, weight, body mass index, haematochemical tests, daily enteral intake. Length of therapy and patient survival were then considered. The outcome was based on patient mortality and the patient's ability to resume oral nutrition.

Results

HEN was prescribed for the following pathologies: 26.7 % neurovascular, 40.9 % neurodegenerative, 11.5 % head-neck cancer, 9.8 % abdominal cancer, 1.5 % head injury, 2.6 % congenital anomaly, 7.0 % other pathologies. Before commencement of enteral feeding an average of 22.9 % weight loss from past weight was observed across all indications for HEN. Mean incidence (cases/106 inhabitants/year) and prevalence (cases/106 inhabitants) were respectively 308.7 (range 80.7–355.6) and 379.8 (range 138.7–534.6). The median length of HEN was 196 days; only 7.9 % of patients resumed oral nutrition. The median survival rate was 9.1 months and resulted influenced by age (Odds ratio: 1.80; 95 % Confidence Interval: 1.19–2.72), sex (0.22; 0.08–0.59), and Karnofsky index (0.65; 0.43–0.97). Resumption of oral nutrition was influenced by age (0.50; 0.36–0.68), sex (2.50; 1.23–5.06), Karnofsky index (1.55; 1.15–2.10) and type of enteral access device (0.44; 0.26–0.76).

Conclusions

Efficient organisation means being able to look after a greater number of patients undergoing HEN, raising awareness regarding the nutritional treatment.


Purchase PDF (322 K)
12 Home enteral and parenteral nutrition in children
Bailliere's Clinical Gastroenterology

12 Home enteral and parenteral nutrition in children
Bailliére’s Clinical GastroenterologyVolume 12, Issue 4December 1998, Pages 877-894
Virginie Colomb, Olivier Goulet, Claude Ricour

Abstract
The prevalence of home enteral and parenteral nutrition programmes is rising rapidly all over the world, in children as in adults. Home artificial nutrition, especially parenteral nutrition, is an expensive technology but is life-saving for many patients. The only possible alternative to home treatment is keeping patients in hospital, and cost-benefit studies have demonstrated that home nutrition is about 70 % more cost-effective than hospital-based therapy. Although home nutrition is usually considered by children and families to lead to an improvement in their quality of life, the complications of these techniques, including psychological consequences, have to be carefully assessed and prevented.

Purchase PDF (1257 K)
View More Related Articles
doi:10.1016/j.nut.2008.01.039
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Abstract

Patient satisfaction and quality of life of home enteral nutrition clients

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700