Binding of type II collagen259–273 (CII), citrullinated and native vimentin66–78, and citrullinated and native 5bfd6c5891de9d449e61e5ace3" title="Click to view the MathML source">α-enolase11–25 was measured on cell lines expressing DRB1*01:01, *01:02 and *01:03 by flow cytometry. Single site mutagenesis was performed to examine how the differences between these alleles affect peptide binding and T cell responses.
DRB1*01:01 exhibited an 8.2-fold preference for binding citrullinated vimentin66–78 over its native form, compared to 7.8-fold for *01:02 and 0.68-fold (preference for binding native) for *01:03. DRB1*01:01 also exhibited a 2-fold preference for binding citrullinated 5bfd6c5891de9d449e61e5ace3" title="Click to view the MathML source">α-enolase11–25 over native, compared to 1.0-fold (no preference) for *01:02 and 0.49-fold (preference for native) for *01:03. In addition, DRB1*01:01 bound more type II collagen (CII)259–273 (3.7-fold over background) than *01:02 (1.1-fold) and *01:03 (1.7-fold). Mutating G86 in DRB1*01:01 to the residue found in DRB1*01:02 (V86) abolished citrullinated 5bfd6c5891de9d449e61e5ace3" title="Click to view the MathML source">α-enolase11–25 and CII259–273 binding and decreased citrullinated vimentin66–78 binding (1.7-fold).
The difference in susceptibility between DRB1*01:01 and *01:02 for RA may be explained by the effect of position 86 on peptide binding.