- 作者：Jamie Brown ; Susan Michie ; Adam W.A. Geraghty ; Sascha Miller ; Lucy Yardley ; Benjamin Gardner ; Lion Shahab ; John A. Stapleton ; Robert West
- 关键词：Smoking cessation intervention ; Internet-based ; Website ; Theory-based ; Pilot
- 刊名：Addictive Behaviors
- 出版年：2012
- 出版时间：December, 2012
- 年：2012
- 卷：37
- 期：12
- 页码：1365-1370
- 全文大小：205 K
Background
This article reports a pilot study of a new smoking cessation website (¡®StopAdvisor¡¯), which has been developed on the basis of PRIME theory, evidence, web-design expertise and user-testing. The aims were to i) evaluate whether cessation, website usage and satisfaction were sufficiently high to warrant a randomised controlled trial (RCT) and ii) assess whether outcomes were affected by socio-economic status.Methods
This was an uncontrolled pilot study. Two hundred and four adult daily smokers willing to make a serious quit attempt were included. All participants received support from ¡®StopAdvisor¡¯, which recommends a structured quit plan and a variety of evidence-based behaviour change techniques for smoking cessation. A series of tunnelled sessions and a variety of interactive menus provide tailored support for up to a month before quitting through until one-month post-quit (). The primary outcome was self-report of at least 1 month of continuous abstinence collected at 2 months post-enrolment and verified by saliva cotinine or anabasine. Usage was indexed by log-ins and page views. Satisfaction was assessed by dichotomous ratings of helpfulness, personal relevance, likelihood of recommendation and future use, which were collected using an online questionnaire at 2 months post-enrolment. Outcomes according to socio-economic status were assessed.
Results
At 8 weeks post-enrolment, 19.6 % (40/204) of participants were abstinent according to the primary outcome criteria (95 % C.I. = 14.1 % to 25.1 % ). Participants viewed a mean of 133.5 pages (median = 71.5) during 6.4 log-ins (median = 3). A majority of respondents rated the website positively on each of the four satisfaction `ratings (range = 66.7 % to 75.3 % ). There was no evidence of an effect of socio-economic status on abstinence (OR = 1.01, C.I. = 0.50-2.07), usage (page-views, t(202) = 0.11, p = .91; log-ins, t(202) = 0.21, p = .83), or satisfaction (helpfulness, OR = 1.09, C.I. = 0.41-2.88; personal relevance, OR = 0.55, C.I. = 0.20-1.56; recommendation, OR = 0.98, C.I. = 0.34-2.81; use in future, OR = 1.45, C.I. = 0.49-4.27).
Conclusions
The systematic application of theory, evidence, web-design expertise, and user-testing has resulted in a website that shows sufficiently promising efficacy and usability to warrant evaluation in a RCT. The website appears to be similarly effective and acceptable to users across the social spectrum.