25 patients underwent resuscitation (13 in witnessed resuscitation group, 12 in control group). Three patients in the witnessed group survived, all the control-group patients died. Two relatives in each group were lost to follow-up. Thus, eight relatives who witnessed resuscitation and ten control-group relatives were followed up. There were no reported adverse psychological effects among the relatives who witnessed resuscitation, all of whom were satisfied with their decision to remain with the patient. The clinical team became convinced of the benefits to relatives of allowing them to witness resuscitation if they wished, so the trial was terminated.
In the context of the emergency department, routine exclusion of relatives from the resuscitation room may no longer be appropriate.
w('infobubble_3','mlktLink_3')"" onMouseOut=""InfoBubble.timeout()"">The relationship between the hospital setting and perce... Resuscitation |
Resuscitation, Volume 70, Issue 1, July 2006, Pages 74-79 Cheryl Macy, Emily Lampe, Brian O’Neil, Robert Swor, Robert Zalenski, Scott Compton Abstract SummaryObjectiveTo compare the support for, and perceptions of, family-witnessed resuscitation (FWR) in urban and suburban emergency departments (ED). |
View More Related Articles |
Witnessed resuscitation: A comparison of the preferences and views between survivors of resuscitation and hospitalised patients without this experience