Clustering of retrospectively reported and prospectively observed time-to-pregnancy
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
Given reportedly high clustering but limited validity of retrospectively reported time-to-pregnancy (TTP), we assessed within-woman clustering for retrospectively reported TTPs alone and including gold-standard prospectively observed TTPs among women with 2 or more retrospectively reported and 1 or more prospectively observed TTPs. We further investigated whether past trying times inform future trying time among women with 1 or more retrospectively reported and 1 or more prospectively observed TTPs.

Methods

Five hundred one couples attempting pregnancy were prospectively observed until human chorionic gonadotropin pregnancy or 12 months of trying. Women reported TTP for past planned pregnancies. Clustering as measured by the frailty variance was estimated using discrete Cox frailty models, adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking at each attempt. Utility of past attempts to inform future attempts was assessed with discrete Cox models and relative risk regression, adjusted for enrollment age, body mass index, smoking.

Results

Seventy-five women with 2 or more prior pregnancies contributed 180 retrospective and 91 prospective TTPs for frailty modeling. Retrospectively reported TTP clustering was high (frailty variance = 0.89) but substantially lower when including prospectively observed TTPs (frailty variance = 0.42). Among 202 women with 1 or more prior pregnancies, past trying times did not inform future trying time.

Conclusions

TTP recall rather than TTP may account for clustering. Past trying times may not inform future trying times.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700