Including non-public data and studies in systematic reviews and systematic maps

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Neal R. Haddaway^a ; ^{neal_haddaway@hotmail.com} ; Alexandra M. Collins^b ; ^{alexandra.collins@imperial.ac.uk} ; Deborah Coughlin^c ; ^{drdcoughlin@googlemail.com} ; Christian Kohl^d ; ^{christian.kohl@julius-kuehn.de}
• 关键词：Private data ; Restricted access ; Industrial data ; Commercial data ; Grey literature ; Dark data
• 刊名：Environment International
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：February 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：99
• 期：Complete
• 页码：351-355
• 全文大小：239 K
• 卷排序：99

文摘

Systematic reviews (SRs) should be comprehensive and repeatable. Reviewers may be aware of relevant studies not accessible to the public. Non-public studies should only be included if they have detailed descriptions. Some non-public studies may have restrictions preventing inclusion in a SR. Such studies should be noted and their potential impact on SR results described.