Pre-stimulus alpha power affects vertex N2–P2 potentials evoked by noxious stimuli

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Claudio Babiloni ; Claudio Del Percio ; Alfredo Brancucci ; Paolo Capotosto ; Domenica Le Pera ; Nicola Marzano ; Massimiliano Valeriani ; Gian Luca Romani ; Lars Arendt-Nielsen ; Paolo Maria Rossini
• 关键词：Pre-stimulus alpha rhythms ; Laser evoked potentials (LEPs) ; Noxious stimulation ; CO₂ laser ; Vertex N2– ; P2 complex
• 刊名：Brain Research Bulletin
• 出版年：2008
• 出版时间：28 March 2008
• 年：2008
• 卷：75
• 期：5
• 页码：581-590
• 全文大小：860 K

文摘

It is well known that scalp potentials evoked by nonpainful visual and auditory stimuli are enhanced in amplitude when preceded by pre-stimulus low-amplitude alpha rhythms. This study tested the hypothesis that the same holds for the amplitude of vertex N2–P2 potentials evoked by brief noxious laser stimuli, an issue of interest for clinical perspective. EEG data were recorded in 10 subjects from 30 electrodes during laser noxious stimulation. The artifact-free vertex N2–P2 complex was spatially enhanced by surface Laplacian transformation. Pre-stimulus alpha power was computed at three alpha sub-bands according to subject's individual alpha frequency peak (i.e. about 6–8 Hz for alpha 1, 8–10 Hz for alpha 2 and 10–12 Hz for alpha 3 sub-band). Individual EEG single trials were divided in two sub-groups. The strong-alpha sub-group (high band power) included halfway of all EEG single trials, namely those having the highest pre-stimulus alpha power. Weak-alpha sub-group (low band power) included the remaining trials. Averaging procedure provided laser evoked potentials for both trial sub-groups. No significant effect was found for alpha 1 and alpha 2 sub-bands. Conversely, compared to strong-alpha 3 sub-group, weak-alpha 3 sub-group showed vertex N2–P2 potentials having significantly higher amplitude (p < 0.05). These results extend to the later phases of pain processing systems the notion that generation mechanisms of pre-stimulus alpha rhythms and (laser) evoked potentials are intrinsically related and subjected to fluctuating “noise”. That “noise” could explain the trial-by-trial variability of laser evoked potentials and perception.