Improvement of long-term survival by cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure patients: A case-control study

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Ming Liu ; Fang Fang ; Xiu Xia Luo ; Ben-Haim Shlomo¹ ; Daniel Burkhoff¹ ; Joseph Y.S. Chan ; Chin-Pang Chan ; Lili Cheung ; Benny Rousso¹ ; David Gutterman¹ ; Cheuk-Man Yu ; ^{professorcmyu@gmail.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}
• 关键词：Heart failure ; Cardiac contractility modulation ; Long-term survival
• 刊名：International Journal of Cardiology
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：1 March 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：206
• 期：Complete
• 页码：122-126
• 全文大小：649 K

文摘

Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) has been shown to be effective in improving symptoms and cardiac function in heart failure (HF). However, there is limited data on the role of CCM on long-term survival, which was explored in the present study.

Methodology

Forty-one consecutive HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) < 40% received CCM and were followed for approximately 6 years. They were compared with another 41 HF patients who were enrolled into the HF registry in the same period, and had similar age, gender, EF and etiology of HF. The primary end-point was all cause-mortality. This was stratified by EF. Secondary end-points included HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and the composite outcome of death or heart failure hospitalization.

Results

The CCM and control groups were well balanced for demographic data, medications and baseline left ventricular EF (27 ± 6 vs 27 ± 7%, p = NS). The mean follow-up duration was 75 ± 19 months in the CCM group and 69 ± 17 months in the control group. All-cause mortality was lower in the CCM group than the control group (39% vs. 71%, respectively; Log-rank χ² = 11.23, p = 0.001). Of note, the improvement of all-cause mortality is more dramatic in patients with EF ≥ 25–40% (36% vs. 80%, Log-rank χ² = 15.8, p < 0.001) than those with EF < 25% (50% vs. 56%, p = NS), CCM vs. control respectively. Similar results were shown for the benefit of CCM in the secondary endpoints of cardiovascular death, and the composite outcome of death or heart failure hospitalization. The occurrence of HF hospitalization showed no significant difference between CCM and control groups in the whole cohort (41% vs. 49%, p = NS), but was significantly lower with CCM in subjects with EF ≥ 25–40% at baseline (36% vs. 64%, Log-rank χ² = 7.79, p = 0.005).

Conclusion

CCM resulted in significant improvement of long-term survival, in particular in those with EF ≥ 25–40%. A reduction in heart failure hospitalizations was also seen in this group of patients with less severely reduced EF.