Comparison of a Cognitive-Behavioral Coping Skills Group to a Peer Support Group in a Brain Injury Population

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Samantha Backhaus ; PhD^a ; ^b ; ^{Samantha.backhaus@rhin.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Summer Ibarra ; PhD^a ; ^b ; Devan Parrott ; MS^a ; James Malec ; PhD ; ABPP^a ; ^b
• 关键词：Adaptation ; psychological ; Brain injuries ; Cognitive therapy ; Rehabilitation
• 刊名：Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：February 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：97
• 期：2
• 页码：281-291
• 全文大小：828 K

文摘

To compare the efficacy of 2 group treatments for persons with brain injury (BI) and their caregivers in promoting perceived self-efficacy (PSE) and emotional and neurobehavioral functioning.

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Outpatient BI rehabilitation.

Participants

Subjects (N=38), including 19 with BI and 19 caregivers, participated in a BI coping skills group or a support group.

Interventions

BI coping skills is a manualized cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT). CBT was compared with a structurally equivalent support group.

Main Outcome Measures

Brain Injury Coping Skills Questionnaire (PSE), Brief Symptom Inventory-18 ([BSI-18]; emotional distress), and Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (neurobehavioral functions).

Results

There were no significant differences between survivors and caregivers on the Brain Injury Coping Skills Questionnaire and BSI-18; therefore, groups were combined during final analyses. Frontal Systems Behavior Scale caregiver data were used for analysis. Both groups showed significantly improved PSE between baseline and follow-up on repeated-measures analysis of variance, with the CBT group showing greater stabilization of change. There was no significant group by time interaction on measures of neurobehavioral functions, but the CBT group showed significant improvements at 3-month follow-up. No significant effects were found on the BSI-18.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, no studies to date have been published comparing a CBT intervention with a support group in a BI population with caregiver participation. This study showed that given equivalent group structure, individuals with BI and caregivers may benefit from either type of intervention in enhancing PSE or maintaining emotional stability. However, there was a trend for individuals who received CBT to maintain the effects of improved PSE, whereas support group participants showed a trend for decline. This study offers a new conceptualization that with certain group dynamics and support, individuals with BI and caregivers may benefit similarly from either a support group or CBT intervention. However, because our sample did not include individuals in clinically significant emotional distress, we cannot rule out the possibility that those with more significant challenges in PSE or emotional functions may show greater benefits with a CBT group.