We enrolled 31 subjects (19 with gynecologic cancer and 12 with anal cancer) in an institutional review board-approved prospective trial (6 in the pilot study, 10 in phase IA, and 15 in phase IB). The mean age was 52 years; 8 of 31 patients (26 % ) were men. Twenty-one subjects completed 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) simulation and magnetic resonance imaging by use of quantitative IDEAL (IDEAL IQ; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI). The PET/CT and IDEAL IQ were registered, and BM subvolumes were segmented above the mean standardized uptake value and below the mean fat fraction within the pelvis and lumbar spine; their intersection was designated as functional BM for IMRT planning. Functional BM-sparing vs total BM-sparing IMRT plans were compared in 12 subjects; 10 were treated with functional BM-sparing pelvic IMRT per protocol.
In gynecologic cancer patients, the mean functional BM V10 (volume receiving ¡Ý10 Gy) and V20 (volume receiving ¡Ý20 Gy) were 85 % vs 94 % (P<.0001) and 70 % vs 82 % (P<.0001), respectively, for functional BM-sparing IMRT vs total BM-sparing IMRT. In anal cancer patients, the corresponding values were 75 % vs 77 % (P=.06) and 62 % vs 67 % (P=.002), respectively. Of 10 subjects treated with functional BM-sparing pelvic IMRT, 3 (30 % ) had acute grade 3 hematologic toxicity or greater.
IMRT can reduce dose to BM subregions identified by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT and IDEAL IQ. The efficacy of BM-sparing IMRT is being tested in a phase II trial.