Venoarterial versus venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: The extracorporeal life support organization registry, 1990-1999
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
Background/Purpose: Venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) traditionally has been the mode of support used in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). A few studies report success using venovenous (VV) ECMO. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes in CDH patients treated with VA and VV. Methods: The authors queried the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry for newborns with CDH treated with ECMO from January 1, 1990 through December 31, 1999. They analyzed the pre-ECMO data, ECMO course, and complications. Results: VA was utilized in 2,257 (86 % ) and VV in 371 (14 % ) patients. The pre-ECMO status was similar, with greater use of nitric oxide, surfactant, and pressors in VV. Survival rate was similar (58.4 % for VV and 52.2 % for VA, P = .057). VA was associated with more seizures (12.3 % v 6.7 % , P = .0024) and cerebral infarction (10.5 % v 6.7 % , P = .03). Sixty-four treatments were converted from VV to VA (VV→VA). Survival rate in VV→VA was not significantly different than VA (43.8 % v 52.2 % , respectively; P = .23). VV→VA and VA patients had similar neurologic complications. Conclusions: CDH patients treated with VV and VA have similar survival rates. VA had more neurologic complications. The authors identified no disadvantage to the use of VV as an initial mode of ECMO for CDH, although some infants may need conversion to VA. J Pediatr Surg 36:1199-1204.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700