Prehospital ultrasound of the abdomen and thorax changes trauma patient management: A systematic review

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：D. O&rsquo ; Dochartaigh^a ; ^{domhnall13@hotmail.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; ^{dodochartaigh@stars.ca" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; M. Douma^b ; ^{matthew.douma@albertahealthservices.ca" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; ^{matthewjdouma@gmail.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}
• 关键词：Ultrasound ; Prehospital ; Systematic review ; Sonography ; Emergency medical services ; Air medical transport ; Helicopter ; Trauma ; FAST ; EFAST
• 刊名：Injury
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：November 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：46
• 期：11
• 页码：2093-2102
• 全文大小：432 K

文摘

Ultrasound examination of trauma patients is increasingly performed in prehospital services. It is unclear if prehospital sonographic assessments change patient management: providing prehospital diagnosis and treatment, determining choice of destination hospital, or treatment at the receiving hospital.

Objective

This review aims to assess and grade the evidence that specifically examines whether prehospital ultrasound (PHUS) of the thorax and/or abdomen changes management of the trauma patient.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted of trauma patients who had an ultrasound of the thorax or abdomen performed in the prehospital setting. PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science (CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and the reference lists of included studies were searched. Methodological quality was checked and risk of bias analysis performed, a level of evidence grade was assigned, and descriptive data analysis performed.

Results

992 unique citations were identified, which included eight studies that met inclusion criteria with a total of 925 patients. There are no reports of randomised controlled trials. Heterogeneity exists between the included studies which ranged from a case series to retrospective and prospective non-randomised observational studies. Three studies achieved a 2+ Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Networks grade for quality of evidence and the remainder demonstrated a high risk of bias. The three best studies each provided examples of prehospital ultrasound positively changing patient management.

Conclusion

There is moderate evidence that supports prehospital physician use of ultrasound for trauma patients. For some patients, management was changed based on the results of the PHUS. The benefit of ultrasound use in non-physician services is unclear.