A new perceptual difference model for diagnostically relevant quantitative image quality evaluation: A preliminary study

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Jun Miao^a ; Feng Huang^c ; Sreenath Narayan^a ; David L. Wilson^a ; ^b ; ^{dlw@po.cwru.edu}
• 关键词：Perceptual difference model ; Image quality ; Image artifact ; Noise ; Blur ; Aliasing ; Oil painting ; Compressed sensing ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; DSCQS ; FMT
• 刊名：Magnetic Resonance Imaging
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：May, 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：31
• 期：4
• 页码：596-603
• 全文大小：796 K

文摘

Purpose

Most objective image quality metrics average over a wide range of image degradations. However, human clinicians demonstrate bias toward different types of artifacts. Here, we aim to create a perceptual difference model based on Case-PDM that mimics the preference of human observers toward different artifacts.

Method

We measured artifact disturbance to observers and calibrated the novel perceptual difference model (PDM). To tune the new model, which we call Artifact-PDM, degradations were synthetically added to three healthy brain MR data sets. Four types of artifacts (noise, blur, aliasing or ¡°oil painting¡± which shows up as flattened, over-smoothened regions) of standard compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction, within a reasonable range of artifact severity, as measured by both PDM and visual inspection, were considered. After the model parameters were tuned by each synthetic image, we used a functional measurement theory pair-comparison experiment to measure the disturbance of each artifact to human observers and determine the weights of each artifact's PDM score. To validate Artifact-PDM, human ratings obtained from a Double Stimulus Continuous Quality Scale experiment were compared to the model for noise, blur, aliasing, oil painting and overall qualities using a large set of CS-reconstructed MR images of varying quality. Finally, we used this new approach to compare CS to GRAPPA, a parallel MRI reconstruction algorithm.

Results

We found that, for the same Artifact-PDM score, the human observer found incoherent aliasing to be the most disturbing and noise the least. Artifact-PDM results were highly correlated to human observers in both experiments. Optimized CS reconstruction quality compared favorably to GRAPPA's for the same sampling ratio.

Conclusions

We conclude our novel metric can faithfully represent human observer artifact evaluation and can be useful in evaluating CS and GRAPPA reconstruction algorithms, especially in studying artifact trade-offs.