A look at three measurement techniques for bubble size determination
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
Three methods for measuring the volume and the equivalent radius of air bubbles at detachment from the tip of different capillary tubes in quiescent water were tested. The aim was to provide an accurate cross-calibration of two of the methods against a standard laboratory method. The inverted funnel method is the laboratory standard and performed within a 0.5 % repeatability error for 50 bubble sets. The passive acoustic method performed within an accuracy between 97 % and 99 % with respect to the inverted funnel method. The photographic method gave an accuracy between 88 % and 96 % . After improvement of the photographic method by an empirical cutting edge criterion, its accuracy was raised between 95 % and 99 % . The bubble shape at detachment was found to be fitted by a Cassini’s oval or by a Bernoulli’s lemniscate according to the formation time. Qualitative observations on the bubble formation stage indicated an early vertical nose growth for the larger diameter capillary tubes at short formation times. The major-axis vertical and horizontal lengths were measured as functions of time at the formation stage.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700