One-year outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial: A prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences

Objectives

A new class of rapid-deployment aortic valves has emerged with the potential to simplify minimally invasive aortic surgery and reduce crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times. We report the 1-year clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, Calif) in the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial.

Methods

Seventeen surgeons from 6 European centers treated 152 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis requiring valve replacement in a prospective, single-arm trial. A stented trileaflet bovine pericardial bioprosthesis with a balloon-expandable, cloth-covered stent frame at the inflow aspect was implanted in 146 patients (mean age, 75.5 ¡À 6.7 years; 52.7 % were female). Five valve sizes were evaluated (19-27 mm); 58.9 % of cases had isolated aortic valve replacement, and 41.1 % of cases involved concomitant procedures. Minimally invasive surgical approaches occurred in 48.8 % of the isolated aortic valve replacements. Patients were followed at discharge, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively.

Results

Implantation success was 96.1 % (146/152), early valve-related mortality was 1.4 % (2/146), and cumulative survival was 92.5 % at a mean follow-up of 9.8 ¡À 5.1 months. Crossclamp time for isolated aortic valve replacement was 41.1 ¡À 10.6 minutes. Independent core laboratory-adjudicated mean effective orifice area and aortic valve pressure gradient were 1.7 ¡À 0.2 cm2 and 8.8 ¡À 3.0 mm Hg at 3 months, and 1.7 ¡À 0.2 cm2 and 8.4 ¡À 3.4 mm Hg at 1 year, respectively.

Conclusions

Implantation of the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System is feasible, safe, and efficacious for aortic valve replacement. Aortic crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were reduced compared with those for conventional aortic valve replacement. Early hemodynamic performance was excellent and remained so up to 1?year.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700