This was a 24-week double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled study () of 343 asthma patients (鈮?2 years) not controlled by their current ICS. Patients were randomised (1:1:1) to FF100聽渭g, placebo (both administered once-daily [OD] via ELLIPTA鈩?dry powder inhaler in the evening) or fluticasone propionate (FP) 250聽渭g (administered twice-daily (BD) via DISKUS鈩?ACCUHALER鈩?. Primary endpoint was change from baseline in pre-dose evening forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) at Week 24; change from baseline in % rescue-free 24-h periods was a powered secondary endpoint. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed.
FF100聽渭g OD and FP250聽渭g BD significantly improved pre-dose evening FEV1 compared with placebo at Week 24 (+146聽ml [p聽=聽0.009] and +145聽ml [p聽=聽0.011], respectively). Percentage of rescue-free 24-h periods was increased with FF100聽渭g OD (+14.8%) and FP250聽渭g BD (+17.9%) compared to placebo (both p聽<聽0.001). On-treatment AEs were reported by 53% (FF100聽渭g OD), 42% (FP250聽渭g BD) and 40% (placebo) of patients. On-treatment severe asthma exacerbations were lower with FF100聽渭g OD (3%) and FP250聽渭g BD (2%) than placebo (7%). There was significant suppression of urinary cortisol at week 24 with FF100聽渭g OD (p聽=聽0.030) and FP250聽渭g BD (p聽=聽0.036) relative to placebo.
FF100聽渭g OD, administered in the evening, achieves significant improvements in lung function and rescue inhaler use over 24 weeks, comparable to FP250聽渭g BD with similar safety profile.