A study of fresh stillbirths weighing 2500 g or more at three academic hospitals in South Africa

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Marlene Bothma ; ^{marlene.bothma@ogdr.co.za" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Eckhart J. Buchmann
• 关键词：Birth asphyxia ; Fetal monitoring ; Intrapartum-related deaths ; Low-income countries ; Perinatal mortality ; Stillbirth
• 刊名：International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：August 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：134
• 期：2
• 页码：186-189
• 全文大小：156 K

文摘

To determine the frequency of fresh stillbirths weighing 2500 g or more, to assess the risk factors and direct obstetric causes, and to describe avoidable factors in terms of substandard intrapartum management.

Methods

A prospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted at three obstetric teaching units in Johannesburg, South Africa. Data were consecutively collected for 6 months at each of the hospitals, leading to an 18-month data collection period from May 1, 2011, to October 31, 2012. The study population was hospital-born, singleton fresh stillbirths weighing 2500 g or more.

Results

Overall, 52 fresh stillbirths were eligible. Intrapartum catastrophic events were recorded in 30 (58%) cases (16 placental abruption, 7 cord prolapse, 4 ruptured uterus, and 3 entrapment of aftercoming head during breech delivery). Intrauterine fetal death was recorded on arrival at hospital in 15 (29%) cases. Twenty-two (42%) women underwent cardiotocography monitoring; 15 (29%) had no fetal monitoring. Among 25 cases in which the emergency was recognized, the median time from recognition of emergency to delivery was 182 minutes (range 13–360).

Conclusion

There appears to be a failure to detect or respond to evidence of fetal distress even in facilities with skilled staff and available resources.