Four thermoplastic (polyamide: Valplast庐; VLP and Lucitone FRS庐; FRS, polyethylene terephthalate: EstheShot庐; ES, and polyester: EstheShot Bright庐; ESB) and two conventional acrylic (Heat-polymerizing: Urban庐; HC, and Pour type auto-polymerizing: Pro-Cast DSP庐; PR) denture base resins were examined. Eight specimens, approximately 10 mm 脳 10 mm 脳 30 mm in size, of each material were fabricated. Scratch test was performed by a scratch tester with a diamond indenter of 10-渭m radius and cone angle 90掳, applying a constant load of 500 mN, and 2-mm-long scratches were made. The scratch marks were studied under 3D laser measuring microscope and cross-section profiles at approximately 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, and 1.5 mm from the starting point were extracted and measured with analysis software. Data from 24 cross-section profiles in each denture base material were analyzed.
The maximum depths of ES, ESB and FRS were greater than VLP, PR and HC, and the scratch widths of ES, ESB, FRS and VPL were greater than PR and HC.
The results showed that the surface of thermoplastic denture base resins was easily damaged compared to polymethyl methacrylate.