Fixation of Regan-Morrey Type II Coronoid Fractures: A Comparison of Screws and Suture Lasso Technique for Resistance to Displacement
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
The aim of this study was to compare the load to failure and stiffness achieved in coronoid fractures treated with a posterior-to-anterior screw versus a suture lasso technique.MethodsWe performed a biomechanical study using 10 pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows. A transverse osteotomy at the midpoint of the coronoid height was created to simulate a Regan–Morrey type II coronoid fracture. The specimens were randomized to screw fixation or suture lasso fixation. The load to failure and stiffness were then measured using a materials testing machine.ResultsScrew fixation provided greater strength and stiffness than suture lasso fixation. Mean load to failure was 405 N in the screw fixation group compared with a load to failure of 207 N for suture fixation. Screw fixation resulted in a mean stiffness of 284 kPa/mm compared with 119 kPa/mm after suture fixation.ConclusionsScrew fixation was biomechanically superior to fixation using a suture lasso technique. For coronoid fractures in which screw or suture fixation is feasible, screw fixation may provide greater resistance to displacement of the coronoid compared with a suture lasso technique.Clinical relevanceClinical studies have reported a higher rate of failure after screw fixation compared with suture lasso fixation; however, this study demonstrated a greater stiffness and load to failure after screw fixation of type II coronoid fractures. Screw fixation may provide a stronger fixation construct for fractures of adequate size to support a screw. Further studies may be warranted to assess the importance of securing the anterior capsule to the coronoid tip when using a suture lasso construct because this may affect the stability of the elbow after fixation.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700