Evidence for greater cue reactivity among low-dependent vs. high-dependent smokers

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Noreen L. Watson ; Matthew J. Carpenter ; Michael E. Saladin ; Kevin M. Gray ; Himanshu P. Upadhyaya
• 关键词：Cue reactivity ; Craving ; Dependence ; Smoking ; Nicotine
• 刊名：Addictive Behaviors
• 出版年：2010
• 出版时间：July 2010
• 年：2010
• 卷：35
• 期：7
• 页码：673-677
• 全文大小：220 K

文摘

Introduction

Cue reactivity paradigms are well-established laboratory procedures used to examine subjective craving in response to substance-related cues. For smokers, the relationship between nicotine dependence and cue reactivity has not been clearly established. The main aim of the present study was to further examine this relationship.

Methods

Participants (N = 90) were between the ages 18–40 and smoked ≥10 cigarettes per day. Average nicotine dependence (Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence; FTND) at baseline was 4.9 (SD = 2.1). Participants completed four cue reactivity sessions consisting of two in vivo cues (smoking and neutral) and two affective imagery cues (stressful and relaxed), all counterbalanced. Craving in response to cues was assessed following each cue exposure using the Questionnaire of Smoking Urges-Brief (QSU-B). Differential cue reactivity was operationally defined as the difference in QSU scores between the smoking and neutral cues, and between the stressful and relaxed cues.

Results

Nicotine dependence was significantly and negatively associated with differential cue reactivity scores in regard to hedonic craving (QSU factor 1) for both in vivo and imagery cues, such that those who had low FTND scores demonstrated greater differential cue reactivity than those with higher FTND scores (β = −.082; p = .037; β = −.101; p = .023, respectively). Similar trends were found for the Total QSU and for negative reinforcement craving (QSU factor 2), but did not reach statistical significance.

Discussion

Under partially sated conditions, less dependent smokers may be more differentially cue reactive to smoking cues as compared to heavily dependent smokers. These findings offer methodological and interpretative implications for cue reactivity studies.