Impact responses of the cervical spine: A computational study of the effects of muscle activity, torso constraint, and pre-flexion
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Roger W. Nightingale ; rwn@duke.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Jake Sganga ; Hattie Cutcliffe ; Cameron R. &lsquo ; Dale&rsquo ; Bass
- 关键词：Biomechanics ; Cervical spine ; Bilateral facet Dislocation ; Buckling ; Muscle ; Initial conditions ; Compression ; Pre-flexion ; Preflexion ; Alignment
- 刊名：Journal of Biomechanics
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：29 February 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：49
- 期：4
- 页码：558-564
- 全文大小：2396 K
文摘
Cervical spine injuries continue to be a costly societal problem. Future advancements in injury prevention depend on improved physical and computational models, which are predicated on a better understanding of the neck response during dynamic loading. Previous studies have shown that the tolerance of the neck is dependent on its initial position and its buckling behavior. This study uses a computational model to examine three important factors hypothesized to influence the loads experienced by vertebrae in the neck under compressive impact: muscle activation, torso constraints, and pre-flexion angle of the cervical spine. Since cadaver testing is not practical for large scale parametric analyses, these factors were studied using a previously validated computational model. On average, simulations with active muscles had 32% larger compressive forces and 25% larger shear forces—well in excess of what was expected from the muscle forces alone. In the short period of time required for neck injury, constraints on torso motion increased the average neck compression by less than 250 N. The pre-flexion hypothesis was tested by examining pre-flexion angles from neutral (0°) to 64°. Increases in pre-flexion resulted in the largest increases in peak loads and the expression of higher-order buckling modes. Peak force and buckling modality were both very sensitive to pre-flexion angle. These results validate the relevance of prior cadaver models for neck injury and help explain the wide variety of cervical spine fractures that can result from ostensibly similar compressive loadings. They also give insight into the mechanistic differences between burst fractures and lower cervical spine dislocations.