Ion–ion interactions of LiPF₆ and LiBF₄ in propylene carbonate solutions

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Munetaka Takeuchi ; Yasuo Kameda ; Yasuhiro Umebayashi ; Sari Ogawa ; Takaaki Sonoda ; Shin-ichi Ishiguro ; Miho Fujita ; Mitsuru Sano
• 关键词：Lithium ion ; non-aqueous electrolyte solution ; self diffusion coefficient ; PGSE NMR ; MD simulations
• 刊名：Journal of Molecular Liquids
• 出版年：2009
• 出版时间：30 September 2009
• 年：2009
• 卷：148
• 期：2-3
• 页码：99-108
• 全文大小：796 K

文摘

Self-diffusion coefficients of Li⁺ D_Li⁺, PF₆⁻ D_PF6⁻ and solvent propylene carbonate (PC) D_PC in LiPF₆−PC solutions were determined at 298 K by the pulse gradient spin echo (PGSE) NMR technique over the salt concentration range of 0.1–3.0 M (M = mol dm^– 3). The order of the diffusion coefficients was found to be D_Li⁺ < D_PF6⁻ < D_PC over the concentration range examined, and they were monotonically decreased with increasing the salt concentration. Haven ratio Λ/Λ_NMR, where Λ and Λ_NMR represent the ionic conductivity measured electrochemically and that estimated via the Nernst-Einstein equation using the diffusion coefficient, respectively, was evaluated as the measure of the ion–ion interaction in the LiPF₆–PC solutions. Though Λ/Λ_NMR values for LiPF₆-solutions decrease with increasing the salt concentration, they were greater than those for LiBF₄–PC solutions over the whole concentration range examined, which indicates that the ion pair formation ability of PF₆^– ion is weaker than that of the BF₄^– ion. The smaller value of the ionic conductivity for the highly concentrated LiPF₆–PC solution (above 2.0 M) than that of the LiBF₄-solutions can be attributed to the more rapidly increased viscosity relative to the LiBF₄-solution. Classic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for the respective LiPF₆ and LiBF₄-solution of 0.5 and 1.0 M were also carried out based on the effective pair potentials. Diffusion coefficients, ionic conductivity and Haven ratio for these solutions were calculated from MD trajectories, and they qualitatively agree with those evaluated by experiments. Pair correlation functions g_LiO(r) (for Li⁺–O (PC) pair) and g_LiPF6(r) (for Li⁺–PF₆^– pair) or g_LiBF4(r) (for Li⁺–BF₄^– pair) revealed that the lithium ion weakly forms the contact ion pairs with PF₆^–, whilst strongly with BF₄^–, which supports the present experimental results. Moreover, the simulation results show that both anions in the contact ion pairs predominantly take the monodentate form, which is in contrast to the multidentate coordination predicted by ab initio calculation in gas phase.