Bioenergetic gain of citrate anticoagulated continuous hemodiafiltration¡ªa comparison between 2 citrate modalities and unfractionated heparin
详细信息    查看全文
文摘

Purpose

To determine bioenergetic gain of 2 different citrate anticoagulated continuous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) modalities and a heparin modality.

Materials and Methods

We compared the bio-energetic gain of citrate, glucose and lactate between 29 patients receiving 2.2 % acid-citrate-dextrose with calcium-containing lactate-buffered solutions (ACD/Caplus/lactate), 34 on 4 % trisodium citrate with calcium-free low-bicarbonate buffered fluids (TSC/Camin/bicarbonate), and 18 on heparin with lactate buffering (Hep/lactate).

Results

While delivered CVVHDF dose was about 2000 mL/h, total bioenergetic gain was 262kJ/h (IQR 230-284) with ACD/Caplus/lactate, 20 kJ/h (8-25) with TSC/Camin/bicarbonate (P < .01) and 60?kJ/h (52-76) with Hep/lactate. Median patient delivery of citrate was 31.2 mmol/h (25-34.7) in ACD/Caplus/lactate versus 14.8 mmol/h (12.4-19.1) in TSC/Camin/bicarbonate groups (P < .01). Median delivery of glucose was 36.8 mmol/h (29.9-43) in ACD/Caplus/lactate, and of lactate 52.5 mmol/h (49.2-59.1) in ACD/Caplus/lactate and 56.1 mmol/h (49.6-64.2) in Hep/lactate groups. The higher energy delivery with ACD/Caplus/lactate was partially due to the higher blood flow used in this modality and the calcium-containing dialysate.

Conclusions

The bioenergetic gain of CVVHDF comes from glucose (in ACD), lactate and citrate. The amount substantially differs between modalities despite a similar CVVHDF dose and is unacceptably high when using ACD with calcium-containing lactate-buffered solutions and a higher blood flow. When calculating nutritional needs, we should account for the energy delivered by CVVHDF.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700