- 作者：Nat¨¢lia Cristina Lima Rodrigues ; Priscila Campos Sala ; Lilian Mika Horie ; Maria Carolina Gon?alves Dias ; Raquel Susana Matos de Mir ; a Torrinhas ; Jo?o Eg¨ªdio Rom?o Jr. ; Ivan Cecconello ; Dan Linetzky Waitzberg
- 刊名：Journal of Renal Nutrition
- 出版年：2012
- 出版时间：July, 2012
- 年：2012
- 卷：22
- 期：4
- 页码：409-415.e2
- 全文大小：489 K
Objective
In chronic renal failure patients under hemodialysis (HD) treatment, the availability of simple, safe, and effective tools to assess body composition enables evaluation of body composition accurately, in spite of changes in body fluids that occur in dialysis therapy, thus contributing to planning and monitoring of nutritional treatment. We evaluated the performance of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and the skinfold thickness sum (SKF) to assess fat mass (FM) in chronic renal failure patients before (BHD) and after (AHD) HD, using air displacement plethysmography (ADP) as the standard method.Design
This single-center cross-sectional trial involved comparing the FM of 60 HD patients estimated BHD and AHD by BIA (multifrequential; 29 women, 31 men) and by SKF with those estimated by the reference method, ADP. Body fat-free mass (FFM) was also obtained by subtracting the total body fat from the individual total weight.
Results
Mean estimated FM (kg [ % ]) observed by ADP BHD was 17.95 ¡À 0.99 kg (30.11 % ¡À 1.30 % ), with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) of 16.00 to 19.90 (27.56 to 32.66); mean estimated FM observed AHD was 17.92 ¡À 1.11 kg (30.04 % ¡À 1.40 % ), with a 95 % CI of 15.74 to 20.10 (27.28 to 32.79). Neither study period showed a difference in FM and FFM (for both kg and % ) estimates by the SKF method when compared with ADP; however, the BIA underestimated the FM and overestimated the FFM (for both kg and % ) when compared with ADP.
Conclusion
The SKF, but not the BIA, method showed results similar to ADP and can be considered adequate for FM evaluation in HD patients.