A comparison of sediment quality guidelines for toxicity assessment in the Sunderban wetlands (Bay of Bengal, India)
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Andrea Binelli ; Santosh Kumar Sarkar ; Mousumi Chatterjee ; Consuelo Riva ; Marco Parolini ; Bhaskar deb Bhattacharya ; Asok Kumar Bhattacharya ; Kamala Kanta Satpathy
- 关键词：River Ganges ; ERA ; Sediments ; POPs ; SQGs
- 刊名：Chemosphere
- 出版年：2008
- 出版时间：October 2008
- 年：2008
- 卷：73
- 期：7
- 页码：1129-1137
- 全文大小：629 K
文摘
The aim of this paper was to obtain the first screening ecotoxicological risk evaluation in the Sunderban wetlands, the largest prograding delta in the estuarine phase of the River Ganges. The characterization of exposure was conducted by means of an extensive survey of several persistent organic pollutants (PAHs, PCBs, DDTs, PBDEs, HCHs, HCB) measured in seven core sediments from the Sunderban wetlands, obtaining a dataset with more than 2200 analyses. The pollutant effects were assessed by the use of three different sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) previously developed in the literature to evaluate toxicity induced in sediment-dwelling organisms. The three different approaches chosen for risk assessment of the Sunderban were the consensus SQGs obtained by TEC (threshold effect concentration), PEC (probable effect concentration) and EEC (extreme effect concentration), the threshold/probable effect level (TEL/PEL) approach and, finally, the ERL-ERM guidelines, including the m-ERM-Q (mean ERM quotient).
The evaluation of the toxicity induced by a mixture of the target pollutants indicated the importance of γ-HCH contamination in the Sunderban sediments despite the very low concentrations measured in core sediments. A different sensitivity for toxicity assessment due to quality guidelines was obtained, as the consensus SQGs based on TEC were less conservative and protective than the TEL and ERL approaches, while the use of m-ERM-Q seems to be the most powerful tool to predict the toxicity related to a contaminant mixture.