Reducing contact forces in the arch and supra-aortic vessels using the Magellan robot

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Hedyeh Rafii-Tari ; MASc^a ; Celia V. Riga ; MD ; FRCS^b ; ^c ; ^{c.riga@imperial.ac.uk" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Christopher J. Payne ; MEng^a ; Mohamad S. Hamady ; FRCR^c ; Nicholas J.W. Cheshire ; MD ; FRCS^b ; ^c ; Colin D. Bicknell ; MD ; FRCS^b ; ^c ; Guang-Zhong Yang ; PhD ; FREng^a
• 刊名：Journal of Vascular Surgery
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：November 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：64
• 期：5
• 页码：1422-1432
• 全文大小：1416 K

文摘

Conventional catheter manipulation in the arch and supra-aortic trunks carries a risk of cerebral embolization. This study proposes a platform for detailed quantitative analysis of contact forces (CF) exerted on the vasculature, in order to investigate the potential advantages of robotic navigation.

Methods

An anthropomorphic phantom representing a type I bovine arch was mounted and coupled onto a force/torque sensor. Three-axis force readings provided an average root-mean-square modulus, indicating the total forces exerted on the phantom. Each of the left subclavian, left common carotid, and right common carotid arteries was cannulated within a simulated endovascular suite with conventional (n = 42) vs robotic techniques (n = 30) by two operator groups: experts and novices. The procedure path was divided into three phases, and performance metrics corresponding to mean and maximum forces, force impact over time, standard deviation of forces, and number of significant catheter contacts with the arterial wall were extracted.

Results

Overall, median CF were reduced from 1.20 N (interquartile range [IQR], 0.98-1.56 N) to 0.31 N (IQR, 0.26-0.40 N; P < .001) for the right common carotid artery; 1.59 N (IQR, 1.11-1.85 N) to 0.33 N (IQR, 0.29-0.43 N; P < .001) for the left common carotid artery; and 0.84 N (IQR, 0.47-1.08 N) to 0.10 N (IQR, 0.07-0.17 N; P < .001) for the left subclavian artery. Robotic navigation resulted in significant reductions for the mean and maximum forces for each procedural phase. Significant improvements were also seen in other metrics, particularly at the target vessel ostium and for the more anatomically challenging procedural phases. Force reductions using robotic technology were evident for both novice and expert groups.

Conclusions

Robotic navigation can potentially reduce CF and catheter-tissue contact points in an in vitro model, by enhancing catheter stability and control during endovascular manipulation.