Dopamine depletion affects communicative intentionality in Parkinson's disease patients: Evidence from action kinematics

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Elisa Straulino^a ; Tomaso Scaravilli^b ; Umberto Castiello^a ; ^c ; ^d ; ^{umberto.castiello@unipd.it" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}
• 关键词：Communication ; Kinematics ; Reach-to-grasp ; Social cognition ; Social intention
• 刊名：Cortex
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：April 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：77
• 期：Complete
• 页码：84-94
• 全文大小：1285 K

文摘

Appropriate communication is at the heart of successful, healthy social interactions in humans. Deficits in social communication are a hallmark of several neurological and psychiatric disorders. Yet, very little research has been devoted to understanding the mechanisms underlying these issues. It has been suggested that dopamine is a candidate neurotransmitter system involved in stimulating communication in individuals that are not highly motivated to communicate. A typical model to study dopaminergic dysfunctions in humans is represented by Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, who show motor, cognitive and motivational symptoms. Our study aimed to investigate the effects of social communication on actions in non-demented PD patients receiving dopamine replacement therapy (Levodopa = l-Dopa) and in neurologically healthy control participants. Patients' ability to modulate motor patterning depending on the communicative intention motivating the action to be performed was evaluated both in “on” (with l-Dopa) and “off” (without l-Dopa) states. In two main conditions, participants were requested to reach towards, grasp an object, and either simply lift it (individual condition) or lift it with the intent to communicate a meaning to a partner (communicative condition). Movements' kinematics was recorded using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. The results indicate that kinematics is sensitive to communicative intention and that l-Dopa treatment has positive effects on translating communicative intentions into specific motor patterns in PD patients. Although the to-be-grasped object remained the same both the controls and the PD patients in an ‘on’ state adopted different kinematic patterning for the ‘individual’ and the ‘communication’ conditions. The PD patients in the ‘off’ state, instead, were unable to kinematically differentiate between the two conditions. We contend that social and communicative impairments are associated with abnormalities in dopaminergic pathways.