Structural characterization and electrochemical properties of nickel (II) complexes bearing sterically bulky hydrotris(3-phenyl)- and hydrotris(3-tert-butylpyrazol-1-yl)borato ligands

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Alycia K. Frampton^a ; Kathryn Gartland^b ; Nicholas A. Piro^b ; W. Scott Kassel^b ; William G. Dougherty^a ; ^{doughertyw@susqu.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}
• 关键词：Trispyrazolylborate ; Nickel complexes ; Crystal structures ; Electrochemistry ; Synthesis
• 刊名：Polyhedron
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：16 August 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：114
• 期：Complete
• 页码：172-178
• 全文大小：1111 K

文摘

Two series of pseudo-tetrahedral nickel (II) complexes bearing the bulky hydrotris(3-phenyl)- or hydrotris(3-tert-butylpyrazol-1-yl)borato ligands, Tp^PhNiL and Tp^tBuNiL respectively, have been synthesized and characterized with the intent of investigating the affects of substituent size on the redox properties of the nickel center (L = Cl, Br, I, NCS, NO₃). X-ray analysis reveals both Tp ligands bind in a κ³ fashion with the R groups pointing out towards the metal producing a pocket in which the 4th ligand, L, resides. The Tp^Ph ligand results in a larger pocket and produces nickel complexes with distorted solid-state geometries, specifically bent B…Ni…L angles, unlike the corresponding Tp^tBu complexes which show much less variation in structure. Cyclic voltammetry experiments indicate all complexes undergo a Ni^2+/1+ reduction at large negative potentials vs. ferrocene with varying levels of reversibility. The NCS complexes are the most reversible and the easiest to reduce with an average reduction potential of −1.51 V due to the slightly electron withdrawing nature of the thiocyanate ligand. The strong donor properties of the bidentate nitrate ligand result in complexes that are the most difficult to reduce at an average of −1.80 V. Overall, the Tp^PhNiL complexes are easier to reduce than their corresponding Tp^tBuNiL complexes resulting from the weakened donor ability of the Tp^Ph ligand. While the two ligands do produce different structural motifs, the electrochemical trends are more in line with the electronic properties of the complexes than structural differences.