Angioscopic comparison of arterial repair after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation into vulnerable and stable coronary plaques

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Kenji Kawai^a ; ^b ; Minoru Ichikawa^a ; Tohru Masuyama^b ; Yoshiyuki Kijima^a ; ^{y-kijima@ichou.med.osaka-u.ac.jp" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}
• 关键词：Arterial repair ; Drug-eluting stent ; Coronary angioscopy
• 刊名：International Journal of Cardiology
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：15 October 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：221
• 期：Complete
• 页码：855-858
• 全文大小：347 K

文摘

Arterial repair after intracoronary stenting depends on stent types and plaque vulnerability. The aim of this study was angioscopic comparison of arterial repair after implantation of the second-generation drug-eluting stents (G2-DES) between the stable and vulnerable plaques.

Methods

Four types of G2-DES were successfully implanted into stable plaques (n = 41) and vulnerable plaques (n = 34): 13 and 9 Xience-everolimus-, 7 and 6 Endeavor-zotarolimus-, 15 and 9 Resolute-zotarolimus-, and 6 and 10 Nobori-biolimus-eluting stents (EES, E-ZES, R-ZES, and BES), respectively. Coronary angioscopy at 1-year follow-up revealed in-stent appearance, such as neointimal stent coverage (NSC), presence of yellow plaques (YP), and in-stent mural thrombus (MT). NSC was graded into poor and good coverage.

Results

Yellow plaques and mural thrombi were found more frequently in the vulnerable plaques than in the stable plaques (29% vs. 12%, P = 0.06; 12 vs. 0%, P = 0.02; respectively). In EES, poor NSC was observed more frequently in the vulnerable plaques than in the stable plaques (54% vs. 11%, P = 0.04). In BES, YP was observed more frequently in the vulnerable plaques than in the stable plaques (80% vs. 17%, P = 0.01). In E-ZES and R-ZES, there were no significant differences with regards to angioscopic parameters between the stable and vulnerable plaques.

Conclusions

Arterial repair after EES and BES implantation into the vulnerable plaques remained vulnerable even at 1-year follow-up.