Interval to Biochemical Failure Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated by Combined-Modality Radiation Therapy

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Mark Shilkrut ; PhD ; MD^&lowast ; ; P. William McLaughlin ; MD^&lowast ; ; Gregory S. Merrick ; MD^&dagger ; ; Jeffrey M. Vainshtein ; MD^&lowast ; ; Felix Y. Feng ; MD^&lowast ; ; Daniel A. Hamstra ; MD ; PhD^&lowast ; ; ^{dhamm@med.umich.edu}
• 刊名：International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：15 July, 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：86
• 期：4
• 页码：721-728
• 全文大小：564 K

文摘

| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences

Purpose

To validate the prognostic value of interval to biochemical failure (IBF) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HiRPCa) treated with combined-modality radiation therapy (CMRT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

Methods and Materials

We conducted a retrospective review of HiRPCa (prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL, Gleason score [GS] 8-10, or clinical T stage T3-T4) treated with either dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or CMRT. Interval to biochemical failure was classified as ¡Ü18 or >18 months from the end of all therapy to the date of biochemical failure (BF). Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate the prognostic value of IBF ¡Ü18 months for distant metastasis (DM) and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM).

Results

Of 958 patients with a median follow-up of 63.2 months, 175 patients experienced BF. In those with BF, there were no differences in pretreatment clinical characteristics between the EBRT and CMRT groups, except for a higher proportion of patients with GS 8-10 in the CMRT group (70 % vs 52 % , P=.02). Median IBF after all therapy was 24.0 months (interquartile range 9.6-46.0) in the EBRT group and 18.9 months (interquartile range 9.2-34.5) in the CMRT group (P=.055). On univariate analysis, IBF ¡Ü18 months was associated with increased risk of DM and PCSM in the entire cohort and the individual EBRT and CMRT groups. On multivariate analysis, only GS 9-10 and IBF ¡Ü18 months, but not the radiation therapy regimen or ADT use, predicted DM (hazard ratio [HR] 3.7, P<.01, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.4-10.3 for GS 9-10; HR 3.9, P<.0001, 95 % CI 2.4-6.5 for IBF ¡Ü18 months) and PCSM (HR 14.8, P<.009, 95 % CI 2.0-110 for GS 9-10; HR 4.4, P<.0001, 95 % CI 2.4-8.1 for IBF ¡Ü18 months).

Conclusions

Short IBF was highly prognostic for higher DM and PCSM in patients with HiRPCa. The prognostic value of IBF for DM and PCSM was not affected by the radiation therapy regimen or ADT use.