The voltammetric behavior of [Ru(NH
3)
6]
3+ on bare gold and that on 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA)-modified goldsurfaces are almost identical, with formal rate constants for the electron-transfer process of 0.25 and 0.21 cm s
-1,respect
ively. A detailed analysis of the modified surface allowed us to establish that this behavior is due to (i) a highsurface coverage of 0.67, (ii) a low adsorption resistance that minimizes the potential drop across the TBA monolayer,(iii) the enhanced hydrophilic character of the modified surface compared with that of bare gold, and (
iv) a low decayconstant for the electronic coupling of the TBA adlayer that minimizes the tunneling barrier for the electron transfer.The electron-transfer process from Au and Au
![](/images/entities/verbar.gif)
TBA electrodes to the soluble [Ru(NH
3)
6]
3+/2+ redox couple can beexplained according to the multistate model under the Landau-Zener formalism in the nonadiabatic regime that wasrecently proposed (Feldberg, S. W.; Sutin, N.
Chem. Phys.
2006,
324, 216-225). The behavior of soluble[Ru(NH
3)
6]
3+ changes from semi-infinite linear diffusion on Au to finite-length bounded on Au
![](/images/entities/verbar.gif)
TBA, in agreementwith a surface dimension of 2.17 for the TBA adlayer with a bidimensional underlying gold surface. This value forthe surface dimension was determined by two essentially different electrochemical techniques with different sensingcapabilities: cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The estimated dielectric constant ofthe adlayer (around 37) and the low potential drop across the monolayer suggest the formation of a "mirror" patternof water molecules in the diffusion layer, which explains this result.