Solution
1H NMR (proton-NMR) spe
ctros
copy was used to measure the distribution of ni
cotinebetween its free-base and protonated forms at 20
![](/images/entities/deg.gif)
C in (a) water; (b) gly
cerin/water mixtures;and (
c) puff-averaged "smoke" parti
culate matter (PM) produ
ced by the E
clipse
cigarette, aso-
called "harm redu
ction"
cigarette manufa
ctured by R. J. Reynolds (RJR) Toba
cco Co. SmokePM from the E
clipse
contains gly
cerin, water, ni
cotine, and numerous other
components. SmokePM from the E
clipse yielded a signal for the three
N-methyl protons on ni
cotine at a
chemi
calshift of
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/delta.gif" BORDER=0 > (ppm) = 2.79 relative to a trimethylsilane standard. With
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/alpha.gif" BORDER=0>
fb = fra
ction of the totalliquid ni
cotine in free-base form, and
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/alpha.gif" BORDER=0>
a = fra
ction in the a
cidi
c, monoprotonated Ni
cH
+ form,then
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/alpha.gif" BORDER=0>
a +
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/alpha.gif" BORDER=0>
fb ![](/images/entities/ap.gif)
1. (The diprotonated form of ni
cotine was assumed negligible.) When the threetypes of solutions were adjusted so that
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/alpha.gif" BORDER=0>
a ![](/images/entities/ap.gif)
1, the
N-methyl protons yielded
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/delta.gif" BORDER=0 >
a = 2.82 (E
clipsesmoke PM); 2.79 (35% water/65% gly
cerin); and 2.74 (water). When the solutions were adjustedso that
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/alpha.gif" BORDER=0>
fb ![](/images/entities/ap.gif)
1, the
N-methyl protons yielded
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/delta.gif" BORDER=0 >
fb = 2.16 (E
clipse smoke PM); 2.13 (35% water/65% gly
cerin); and 2.10 (water). In all of the solutions, the rate of proton ex
change betweenNi
cH
+ and Ni
c was fast relative to the
1H-NMR
chemi
cal shift differen
ce in hertz. Ea
ch solution
containing both Ni
cH
+ and Ni
c thus yielded a single
N-methyl peak at a
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/delta.gif" BORDER=0 > given by
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/delta.gif" BORDER=0 > =
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/alpha.gif" BORDER=0>
a![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/delta.gif" BORDER=0 >
a+
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/alpha.gif" BORDER=0>
fb![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/delta.gif" BORDER=0 >
fb so that
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/delta.gif" BORDER=0 > varied linearly between
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/delta.gif" BORDER=0 >
a and
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/delta.gif" BORDER=0 >
fb. Sin
ce
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/alpha.gif" BORDER=0>
fb = (
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/delta.gif" BORDER=0 >
a -
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/delta.gif" BORDER=0 >)/(
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/delta.gif" BORDER=0 >
a -
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/delta.gif" BORDER=0 >
fb), then
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/delta.gif" BORDER=0 > =2.79 for the unadjusted E
clipse smoke PM indi
cates
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/alpha.gif" BORDER=0>
fb ![](/images/entities/ap.gif)
0.04. The
effective pH of the E
clipsesmoke PM at 20
![](/images/entities/deg.gif)
C may then be
cal
culated as pH
eff = 8.06 + log[
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/alpha.gif" BORDER=0>
fb/(1 -
![](/images/gif<font color=)
chars/alpha.gif" BORDER=0>
fb)] = 6.69, where8.06 is the p
Ka of Ni
cH
+ in water at 20
![](/images/entities/deg.gif)
C. The measurements obtained for the puff-averagedE
clipse smoke PM pertain to the
chemistry of the smoke PM as it might be initially inhaledat 20
![](/images/entities/deg.gif)
C. Upon inhalation, the volatilization of ni
cotine and other a
cid/base a
ctive
compounds(as well as a warming toward a body temperature of 37
![](/images/entities/deg.gif)
C) will alter the pH
eff value of thesmoke PM during the time that it resides and ages in the respiratory tra
ct.