Molecular Imprinting of Enzymes with Water-Insoluble Ligands for Nonaqueous Biocatalysis
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Joseph O. Rich ; Vadim V. Mozhaev ; Jonathan S. Dordick ; Douglas S. Clark ; and Yuri L. Khmelnitsky
- 刊名：Journal of the American Chemical Society
- 出版年：2002
- 出版时间：May 15, 2002
- 年：2002
- 卷：124
- 期：19
- 页码：5254 - 5255
- 全文大小：31K
- 年卷期：v.124,no.19(May 15, 2002)
- ISSN：1520-5126
文摘
Attaining higher levels of catalytic activity of enzymes in organic solvents is one of the major challenges in nonaqueous enzymology. One of the most successful strategies for enhancing enzyme activity in organic solvents involves tuning the enzyme active site by molecular imprinting with substrates or their analogues. Unfortunately, numerous imprinters of potential importance are poorly soluble in water, which significantly limits the utility of this method. In the present study, we have developed strategies that overcome this limitation of the molecular-imprinting technique and that thus expand its applicability beyond water-soluble ligands. The solubility problem can be addressed either by converting the ligands into a water-soluble form or by adding relatively high concentrations of organic cosolvents, such as tert-butyl alcohol and 1,4-dioxane, to increase their solubility in the lyophilization medium. We have succeeded in applying both of these strategies to produce imprinted thermolysin, subtilisin, and lipase TL possessing up to 26-fold higher catalytic activity in the acylation of paclitaxel and 17
-estradiol compared to nonimprinted enzymes. Furthermore, we have demonstrated for the first time that molecular imprinting and salt activation, applied in combination, produce a strong additive activation effect (up to 110-fold), suggesting different mechanisms of action involved in these enzyme activation techniques.
-estradiol compared to nonimprinted enzymes. Furthermore, we have demonstrated for the first time that molecular imprinting and salt activation, applied in combination, produce a strong additive activation effect (up to 110-fold), suggesting different mechanisms of action involved in these enzyme activation techniques.