The r
adioprotective effects of c
arnosic
acid (CA), c
arnosol (COL),
and rosm
arinic
acid (RO)
ag
ainstchromosom
al d
am
age induced by
![](/im<font color=)
ages/gifch
ars/g
amm
a.gif" BORDER=0 >-r
ays, comp
ared with those of
L-
ascorbic
acid (AA)
and theS-cont
aining compound dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), were determined by use of the micronucleustest for
antimut
agenic
activity, ev
alu
ating the reduction in the frequency of micronuclei (MN) incytokinesis-blocked cells of hum
an lymphocytes before
and
after
![](/im<font color=)
ages/gifch
ars/g
amm
a.gif" BORDER=0 >-r
ay irr
adi
ation. With tre
atmentbefore
![](/im<font color=)
ages/gifch
ars/g
amm
a.gif" BORDER=0 >-irr
adi
ation, the most effective compounds were, in order, CA > RO
![](/im<font color=)
ages/entities/ge.gif"> COL > AA > DMSO.The r
adioprotective effects (
antimut
agenic) with tre
atment
after
![](/im<font color=)
ages/gifch
ars/g
amm
a.gif" BORDER=0 >-irr
adi
ation were lower,
and the mosteffective compounds were CA
and COL. RO
and AA presented sm
all r
adioprotective
activity,
andthe sulfur-cont
aining compound DMSO l
acked
![](/im<font color=)
ages/gifch
ars/g
amm
a.gif" BORDER=0 >-r
ay r
adioprotection c
ap
acity. Therefore, CA
and COL
are the only compounds th
at showed
a signific
ant
antimut
agenic
activity both before
and
after
![](/im<font color=)
ages/gifch
ars/g
amm
a.gif" BORDER=0 >-irr
adi
ation tre
atments. These results
are closely rel
ated to those reported by other
authors on the
antioxid
ant
activity of the s
ame compounds,
and the degree of effectiveness depends on their structure.Furthermore, the results for tre
atments before
and
after
![](/im<font color=)
ages/gifch
ars/g
amm
a.gif" BORDER=0 >-r
ay irr
adi
ation suggest the existence ofdifferent r
adioprotective mech
anisms in e
ach c
ase.Keywords: Rosem
ary; polyphenols;
antioxid
ant; r
adic
al sc
avenger; micronuclei;
antimut
agenic;r
adioprotection; r
adi
ation effects; c
arnosic
acid; c
arnosol; rosm
arinic
acid