Characterization Factors for Global Warming in Life Cycle Assessment Based on Damages to Humans and Ecosystems
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：An M. De Schryver*† ; ‡ ; ; Karin W. Brakkee‡ ; ; Mark J. Goedkoop† ; ; Mark A. J. Huijbregts‡ ;
- 刊名：Environmental Science & Technology
- 出版年：2009
- 出版时间：March 15, 2009
- 年：2009
- 卷：43
- 期：6
- 页码：1689-1695
- 全文大小：237K
- 年卷期：v.43,no.6(March 15, 2009)
- ISSN：1520-5851
文摘
Human and ecosystem health damage due to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is generally poorly quantified in the life cycle assessment of products, preventing an integrated comparison of the importance of GHGs with other stressor types, such as ozone depletion and acidifying emissions. In this study, we derived new characterization factors for 63 GHGs that quantify the impact of an emission change on human and ecosystem health damage. For human health damage, the Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) per unit emission related to malaria, diarrhea, malnutrition, drowning, and cardio-vascular diseases were quantified. For ecosystem health damage, the Potentially Disappeared Fraction (PDF) over space and time of various species groups, including plants, butterflies, birds, and mammals, per unit emission was calculated. The influence of value choices in the modeling procedure was analyzed by defining three coherent scenarios, based on Cultural theory perspectives. It was found that the characterization factor for human health damage by carbon dioxide (CO2) ranges from 1.1 × 10−2 to 1.8 × 10+1 DALY per kton of emission, while the characterization factor for ecosystem damage by CO2 ranges from 5.4 × 10−2 to 1.2 × 10+1 disappeared fraction of species over space and time ((km2·year)/kton), depending on the scenario chosen. The characterization factor of a GHG can change up to 4 orders of magnitude, depending on the scenario. The scenario-specific differences are mainly explained by the choice for a specific time horizon and stresses the importance of dealing with value choices in the life cycle impact assessment of GHG emissions.