Photoinduced Electron Transfer in Ruthenium(II)/Tin(IV) Multiporphyrin Arrays

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：M. Teresa Indelli ; Claudio Chiorboli ; Marco Ghirotti ; Michele Orlandi ; Franco Scandola ; Hyun Jung Kim ; Hee-Joon Kim
• 刊名：Journal of Physical Chemistry B
• 出版年：2010
• 出版时间：November 18, 2010
• 年：2010
• 卷：114
• 期：45
• 页码：14273-14282
• 全文大小：432K
• 年卷期：v.114,no.45(November 18, 2010)
• ISSN：1520-5207

文摘

The photophysical behavior of a series of heterometallic arrays made of a central Sn(IV) porphyrin connected, respectively, to two (SnRu₂), four (SnRu₄), or six (SnRu₆) ruthenium porphyrin units has been studied in dichloromethane. Two different motifs connect the ruthenium porphyrin units to central tin porphyrin core, axial coordination via ditopic bridging ligands and/or coordination to peripheral pyridyl groups of the central porphyrin ring. A remarkable number of electron transfer processes (photoinduced charge separation and recombination processes) have been time-resolved using a combination of emission spectroscopy and fast (nanosecond) and ultrafast (femtosecond) absorption techniques. In these systems both types of molecular components can be selectively populated by light absorption. In all the arrays, the local excited states of these units (the tin porphyrin singlet excited state and the ruthenium porphyrin triplet state) are quenched by electron transfer leading to a charge-separated state where the ruthenium porphyrin unit is oxidized and the tin porphyrin unit is reduced. For each array, the two forward electron transfer processes, as well as the charge recombination process leading back to the ground state, have been kinetically resolved. The rate constants obey standard free-energy correlations with the forward processes lying in the normal free-energy regime and the back reactions in the Marcus inverted region. The comparison between the trimeric (SnRu₂) and pentameric (SnRu₄) arrays shows that all the electron transfer processes are faster in the latter than in the former system. This can be rationalized in terms of differences in electronic factors (due to the different connecting motifs) and driving force. In less polar solvents, such as toluene, the energy of the charge-separated states is substantially lifted, leading to a switch (from electron transfer to triplet energy transfer) in the deactivation mechanism of the excited ruthenium triplet.