Some reactive volatile organic compounds (VOCs) areprone to degradation during sampling in an ozone-richenvironment. A wide variety of different chemicals havebeen used to remove the ozone prior to sampling, but thepossibility of interference by such chemicals with thesampled VOCs has not been thoroughly examined. In thepresent investigation, the retention/degradation of fourterpenes (
![](/images/gifchars/alpha.gif)
-pinene,
![](/images/gifchars/beta2.gif)
-pinene, 3-carene, and limonene) andisoprene together with some of their oxidation products (
![](/images/gifchars/alpha.gif)
-pinene oxide, nopinone, 4-acetyl-1-methylcyclohexene(AMCH), methylglyoxal, and methacrolein) has been studied,using various ozone-removing chemicals in an attemptto evaluate their potential as ozone scrubbers in the samplingof ambient air. The chemicals included in this firstscreening and their ozone-removing capacity are asfollows: KI, MnO
2, and Na
2SO
3 removed ozone for morethan 24 h when exposed to 73-78 ppb (150-160
![](/images/entities/mgr.gif)
g/m
3) ata sampling flow rate of 500 mL/min. Silanized poly(1,4-phenylene sulfide) (PFS) removed ozone for 5 h, unsilanizedPFS removed ozone for 1 h and 50 min, and Na
2S
2O
3removed ozone for 20 min. The recovery of the selectedcompounds with the different scrubbers was >95% for allcompounds for KI; >95% for the terpenes oxidationproducts; >90% for the terpenes and isoprene for PFS;>90% for the terpenes and isoprene for MnO
2 on coppernets, Na
2SO
3, and Na
2S
2O
3; and <90% for the terpenesand isoprene for carulite (a commercial mixture betweenMnO
2, CuO, and Al
2O
3), CuO, and indigo carmine.