Monomeric Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42 Peptides in Solution Adopt Very Similar Ramachandran Map Distributions That Closely Resemble Random Coil

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Julien Roche ; Yang Shen ; Jung Ho Lee ; Jinfa Ying ; Ad Bax
• 刊名：Biochemistry
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：February 9, 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：55
• 期：5
• 页码：762-775
• 全文大小：669K
• ISSN：1520-4995

文摘

The pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease is characterized by the aggregation and fibrillation of amyloid peptides Aβ^1–40 and Aβ^1–42 into amyloid plaques. Despite strong potential therapeutic interest, the structural pathways associated with the conversion of monomeric Aβ peptides into oligomeric species remain largely unknown. In particular, the higher aggregation propensity and associated toxicity of Aβ^1–42 compared to that of Aβ^1–40 are poorly understood. To explore in detail the structural propensity of the monomeric Aβ^1–40 and Aβ^1–42 peptides in solution, we recorded a large set of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) parameters, including chemical shifts, nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs), and J couplings. Systematic comparisons show that at neutral pH the Aβ^1–40 and Aβ^1–42 peptides populate almost indistinguishable coil-like conformations. Nuclear Overhauser effect spectra collected at very high resolution remove assignment ambiguities and show no long-range NOE contacts. Six sets of backbone J couplings (³J_HNHα, ³J_C′C′, ³J_C′Hα, ¹J_HαCα, ²J_NCα, and ¹J_NCα) recorded for Aβ^1–40 were used as input for the recently developed MERA Ramachandran map analysis, yielding residue-specific backbone ?/ψ torsion angle distributions that closely resemble random coil distributions, the absence of a significantly elevated propensity for β-conformations in the C-terminal region of the peptide, and a small but distinct propensity for α_L at K28. Our results suggest that the self-association of Aβ peptides into toxic oligomers is not driven by elevated propensities of the monomeric species to adopt β-strand-like conformations. Instead, the accelerated disappearance of Aβ NMR signals in D₂O over H₂O, particularly pronounced for Aβ^1–42, suggests that intermolecular interactions between the hydrophobic regions of the peptide dominate the aggregation process.