Health and Climate-Relevant Pollutant Concentrations from a Carbon-Finance Approved Cookstove Intervention in Rural India

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Ther W. Aung ; Grishma Jain ; Karthik Sethuraman ; Jill Baumgartner ; Conor Reynolds ; Andrew P. Grieshop ; Julian D. Marshall ; Michael Brauer
• 刊名：Environmental Science & Technology
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：July 5, 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：50
• 期：13
• 页码：7228-7238
• 全文大小：358K
• 年卷期：0
• ISSN：1520-5851

文摘

Efforts to introduce more efficient stoves increasingly leverage carbon-finance to scale up dissemination of interventions. We conducted a randomized intervention study to evaluate a Clean Development Mechanism approved stove replacement impact on fuelwood usage, and climate and health-relevant air pollutants. We randomly assigned 187 households to either receive the intervention or to continue using traditional stoves. Measurements of fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) and absorbance were conducted in cooking areas, village center and at upwind background site. There were minor and overlapping seasonal differences (post- minus preintervention change) between control and intervention groups for median (95% CI) fuel use (−0.60 (−1.02, −0.22) vs −0.52 (−1.07, 0.00) kg day^–1), and 24 h absorbance (35 (18, 60) vs 36 (22, 50) × 10^–6 m^–1); for 24 h PM_2.5, there was a higher (139 (61,229) vs 73(−6, 156) μg m^–3)) increase in control compared to intervention homes between the two seasons. Forty percent of the intervention homes continued using traditional stoves. For intervention homes, absorbance-to-mass ratios suggest a higher proportion of black carbon in PM_2.5 emitted from intervention compared with traditional stoves. Absent of field-based evaluation, stove interventions may be pursued that fail to realize expected carbon reductions or anticipated health and climate cobenefits.