UreE is a homodimeric metallo-chaperone that assists the insertion of Ni
2+ ions in the activesite of urease. The crystal structures of UreE from
Bacillus pasteurii and
Klebsiella aerogenes have beendetermined, but the details of the nickel-binding site were not elucidated due to solid-state effects thatcaused disorder in a key portion of the protein. A complementary approach to this problem is describedhere. Titrations of wild-type
Bacillus pasteurii UreE (
BpUreE) with Ni
2+, followed by metal ion quantitativeanalysis using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), established the bindingof 2 Ni
2+ ions to the functional dimer, with an overall dissociation constant
KD = 35
![](/images/entities/mgr.gif)
M. To establishthe nature, the number, and the geometry of the ligands around the Ni
2+ ions in
BpUreE-Ni
2, X-rayabsorption spectroscopy data were collected and analyzed using an approach that combines ab initioextended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) calculations with a systematic search of several possiblecoordination geometries, using the Simplex algorithm. This analysis indicated the presence of Ni
2+ ionsin octahedral coordination geometry and an average of two histidine residues and four O/N ligands boundto each metal ion. The fit improved significantly with the incorporation, in the model, of a Ni-O-Nimoiety, suggesting the presence of a hydroxide-bridged dinuclear cluster in the Ni-loaded
BpUreE. Theseresults were interpreted using two possible models. One model involves the presence of two identicalmetal sites binding Ni
2+ with negative cooperativity, with each metal ion bound to the conserved His
100as well as to either His
145 or His
147 from each monomer, residues found largely conserved at the C-terminal.The alternative model comprises the presence of two different binding sites featuring different affinityfor Ni
2+. This latter model would involve the presence of a dinuclear metallic core, with one Ni
2+ ionbound to one His
100 from each monomer, and the second Ni
2+ ion bound to a pair of either His
145 orHis
147. The arguments in favor of one model as compared to the other are discussed on the basis of theavailable biochemical data.