Surfactant-Mediated Modulation of Hydrophobic Interactions in Associative Polymer Solutions Containing Cyclodextrin

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Sachin Talwar ; Jonathon Harding ; Keith R. Oleson ; Saad A. Khan
• 刊名：Langmuir
• 出版年：2009
• 出版时间：January 20, 2009
• 年：2009
• 卷：25
• 期：2
• 页码：794-802
• 全文大小：325K
• 年卷期：v.25,no.2(January 20, 2009)
• ISSN：1520-5827

文摘

The ability of nonionic surfactants to modulate the rheological characteristics of comblike hydrophobically modified associative polymer solutions containing cyclodextrin (CD) is examined. Addition of either α- or β-CD to these polymers results in a marked decrease in solution viscosity and viscoelastic properties because of the encapsulation of the polymer hydrophobes by CD. Nonionic surfactants, introduced to such a system, alter the hydrophobic interactions by competing with the polymer hydrophobes for complexation with the CDs. In this regard, nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPe) with different ethylene oxide chain lengths, which determine the hydrophilic−lipophilic balance (HLB) of the surfactant, are used. Our results reveal that the extent and rate of recovery of zero shear viscosity as well as dynamic moduli are strongly influenced by the type of CD (α versus β) as well as the HLB of the surfactant. For polymer solutions containing α-CD, recovery is observed solely in the presence of a low-HLB surfactant (NP6 and NP8). Additionally, in the case of NP6, the viscosity increases monotonically above the original hydrophobically modified alkali-soluble emulsion viscosity with surfactant addition, whereas for that of a higher HLB surfactant (NP15), the viscosity shows no appreciable change. In the case of β-CD, on the other hand, a complete recovery as well as further enhancement of rheological properties is achieved using the above surfactants. However, the trends of viscosity modulation are dissimilar for different surfactants as we witness a monotonous increase in the case of NP6 while a maximum in viscosity is observed in the presence of NP8 and NP15. The contrasting observations can be explained in terms of varying affinities of α- and β-CDs to bind with NP surfactants and the existence of different micellar structures in solution as governed by surfactant HLB. These results are further confirmed by UV/vis spectroscopy and cloud point measurements.