The bi- and trinuclear mixed-valence complexes [{Cp*(dppe)Fe(CC-)}
2(1,3-C
6H
4)][PF
6] (
2+),[{Cp*(dppe)Fe(CC-)}
3(1,3,5-C
6H
3)][PF
6] (
3+), and [{Cp*(dppe)Fe(CC-)}
3(1,3,5-C
6H
3)][PF
6]
2(
32+) were prepared either by oxidation of [{Cp*(dppe)Fe(CC-)}
2(1,3-C
6H
4)] (
2) or [{Cp*(dppe)Fe(CC-)}
3(1,3,5-C
6H
3)] (
3) with 1 or 2 equiv of [(C
5H
5)
2Fe][PF
6] or by reaction betweenthe homovalent species
2 and
22+ or
3 and
33+. After crystallization (CH
2Cl
2/pentane) at-20
![](/images/entities/deg.gif)
C, the mixed-valence complexes
2+,
3+, and
32+ were isolated in good yields (80-93%).The well-resolved separations between the redox processes in the cyclic voltammogramsenabled computation of the comproportionation constants (
Kc ) and the molar fraction (
xn+)for all the species
2n+ (
n = 0, 1, 2) and
3n+ (
n = 0, 1, 2, 3) present in solution. The X-raycrystal structure of
2+ revealed that the two iron atoms are not equivalent, suggesting
localized Fe(II) and Fe(III) sites. IR, Mössbauer, ESR, and UV-vis spectroscopies also provideevidence for
localized oxidation states. Analyses of the NIR spectra showed both a forbiddenligand field transition specific to the Cp*(dppe)Fe(III) fragment and a unique ICT band forthe weakly coupled mixed-valence system
2+ and
3+ (
Vab = 161 and 143 cm
-1, respectively).In the case of the diradical trinuclear mixed-valence
32+, two distinct ICT bands wereobserved and attributed to the two possible independent ways to transfer an electron in thesinglet and triplet states of such a mixed-valence compound. Density functional molecularorbital calculations provide the electronic structure of these mixed-valence systems.