Some
cis,cis,cis-RuX
2(Me
2SO)
2(1,2-Me
2Im)Lcomple
xes [L = 1,2-Me
2Im (1,2-dimethylimidazole) orMe
3B
zm(1,5,6-trimethylbenzimidazole), X = Cl or Br, andMe
2SO = S-bonded DMSO] have been synthesizedand theirrotamers studied in CDCl
3. From 2D NMR data,
cis,cis,cis-RuCl
2(Me
2SO)
2(1,2-Me
2Im)(Me
3B
zm)has 1,2-Me
2Im in position "a" (
cis to bothMe
2SO's and
cis to "b") andMe
3B
zm in position "b" (
trans to oneMe
2SO and
cisto the other). There are two stable atropisomers [head-to-tail(HT, 84%) and head-to-head (HH, 16%), definingthe aromatic H of Ru-N-C-H as head for both ligands].Me
3B
zm has the same orientation in bothatropisomers.In this orientation, the unfavorable interligand stericinteractions of Me
3B
zm with theMe
2SO and1,2-Me
2Imligands appear to be countered by favorable electrostatic attractionbetween the
+ N
2CH moiety ofMe
3B
zmand the
-
cis Cl ligands. Th
e1,2-Me
2Im lacks a
+ N
2CH group,and its orientation is dominated by stericeffects of the 2-Me group. The NMR spectrum of
cis,cis,cis-RuCl
2(Me
2SO)
2(1,2-Me
2Im)
2is consistent with fourrotamers in restricted rotation about both Ru-N bonds: two HH andtwo HT. 2D NMR techniques (NOESYand ROESY) afforded complete proton signal assignments. The liganddisposition could be assessed from thelarge chemical shift dispersion of some 1,2-Me
2Imligand signals (
0.86-1.52 ppm) arising from
cis-1,2-Me
2Im shielding modulated by deshielding influences of the
cishalides. The relative stability of the four rotamerscorrelates best with steric interactions between the 2-Me groups andthe Me
2SO ligands. The mostfavorableconformer (46%) is the HH rotamer with both 2-Me groups pointing awayfrom the Me
2SO ligands. Theleastfavorable conformer (14%) was also HH, but the methyl groups in thiscase point toward the Me
2SO ligands.Inthe HT conformers of intermediate stability (~20%), one 2-Me groupis toward and the other is away from theMe
2SO ligands. The exchange cross-peaks inthe 2D spectra are unusually informative about the dynamicprocessesin solution; the spectra provide evidence that the rotamers interchangein a definite pattern of succession. Thus,all conceivable exchange pathways are not available.1,2-Me
2Im "b" can rotate regardless of theorientation of1,2-Me
2Im "a". 1,2-Me
2Im"a" can rotate
only when "b" has the orientationwith its 2-Me group directed awayfrom "a". Thus, 1,2-Me
2Im "b" can switch1,2-Me
2Im "a" rotation on or off.