Refinement and partial validation of the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in horses

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Marilda Onghero Taffarel (1)
  Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna (2)
  Flavia Augusta de Oliveira (2)
  Guilherme Schiess Cardoso (2)
  Juliana de Moura Alonso (2)
  Jose Carlos Pantoja (2)
  Juliana Tabarelli Brondani (2)
  Emma Love (3)
  Polly Taylor (4)
  Kate White (5)
  Joanna C Murrell (3)
  
  1. Veterinary Medicine Department ; Universidade Estadual de Maring谩 ; Estrada da Paca s/n ; Umuarama ; Brazil
  2. Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology ; College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science ; UNESP 鈥?Univ Estadual Paulista ; Botucatu ; SP ; 18618970 ; Brazil
  3. School of Veterinary Science ; Langford House ; Langford ; UK
  4. Taylor Monroe ; Ely ; Cambridgeshire ; UK
  5. School of Veterinary Medicine and Science ; University of Nottingham ; Nottingham ; UK
  
• 关键词：Validity ; Reliability ; Responsiveness ; Specificity ; Sensitivity ; Relevance ; Horse ; Pain
• 刊名：BMC Veterinary Research
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：December 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：11
• 期：1
• 全文大小：581 KB
• 参考文献：1. Flecknell, P (2008) Analgesia from a veterinary perspective. Br J Anaesth 101: pp. 121-4 CrossRef
  2. Bussieres, G, Jacques, C, Lainay, O, Beauchamp, G, Leblond, A, Cadore, JL (2008) Development of a composite orthopaedic pain scale in horses. Res Vet Sci 85: pp. 294-306 CrossRef
  3. Sutton, GA, Dahan, R, Turner, D, Paltiel, O (2013) A behaviour-based pain scale for horses with acute colic: Scale construction. Vet J 196: pp. 394-401 CrossRef
  4. Sutton, GA, Paltiel, O, Soffer, M, Turner, D (2013) Validation of two behaviour-based pain scales for horses with acute colic. Vet J 197: pp. 646-50 CrossRef
  5. Graubner, C, Gerber, V, Doherr, M, Spadavecchia, C (2011) Clinical application and reliability of a post abdominal surgery pain assessment scale (PASPAS) in horses. Vet J 188: pp. 178-83 CrossRef
  6. DeVon, HA, Block, ME, Moyle-Wright, P, Ernst, DM, Hayden, SJ, Lazzara, DJ (2007) A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarsh 39: pp. 155-64 CrossRef
  7. Brondani, JT, Mama, KR, Luna, SP, Wright, BD, Niyom, S, Ambrosio, J (2013) Validation of the English version of the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in cats. BMC Vet Res 9: pp. 143 CrossRef
  8. Callegari-Jacques, SM (2003) Bioestat铆stica: princ铆pios e aplica莽玫es. Artmed, Porto Alegre
  9. Vet, HCW, Bouter, LM, Bezemer, PD, Beurskens, AJHM (2001) Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 17: pp. 479-87
  10. Cronbach, LJ, Meehl, PE (1955) Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull 52: pp. 22 CrossRef
  11. Brondani, JT, Luna, SPL, Minto, BW, Santos, BPR, Beier, SL, Matsubara, LM (2012) Validity and responsiveness of a multidimensional composite scale to assess postoperative pain in cats. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterin谩ria e Zootecnia 64: pp. 1529-38 CrossRef
  12. Ashley, FH, Waterman-Pearson, AE, Whay, HR (2005) Behavioural assessment of pain in horses and donkeys: application to clinical practice and future studies. Equine Vet J 37: pp. 565-75 CrossRef
  13. Vi帽uela-Fern谩ndez, I, Jones, E, Chase-Topping, ME, Price, J (2011) Comparison of subjective scoring systems used to evaluate equine laminitis. Vet J 188: pp. 171-7 CrossRef
  14. Hewetson, M, Christley, RM, Hunt, ID, Voute, LC (2006) Investigations of the reliability of observational gait analysis for the assessment of lameness in horses. Vet Record 158: pp. 852-8 CrossRef
  15. Pritchett, LC, Ulibarri, C, Roberts, MC, Schneider, RK, Sellon, DC (2003) Identification of potential physiological and behavioral indicators of postoperative pain in horses after exploratory celiotomy for colic. Appl Animal Behav Sci 80: pp. 31-43 CrossRef
  16. Price, J, Catriona, S, Welsh, EM, Waran, (2003) Preliminary evaluation of a behaviour-based system for assessment of post-operative pain in horses following arthroscopic surgery. J Vet Anaesthesia Analgesia 30: pp. 124-37 CrossRef
  17. Short, CE (1998) Fundamentals of pain perception in animals. Appl Animal Behav Sci 59: pp. 125-33 CrossRef
  18. Queiroz-Neto, A, Carregaro, AB, Zamur, G, Harkins, JD, Tobin, T, Mataqueiro, MI (2000) Effect of amitraz and xylazine on some physiological variables of horses. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterin谩ria e Zootecnia 52: pp. 27-32 CrossRef
  19. Suraseranivongse, S, Santawat, U, Kraiprasit, K, Petcharatana, S, Prakkamodom, S, Muntraporn, N (2001) Cross-validation of a composite pain scale for preschool children within 24聽hours of surgery. Br J Anaesth 87: pp. 400-5 CrossRef
  20. Fleiss, JL The measurement of interrater agreement. In: Fleiss, JL eds. (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, pp. 212-36
  21. Institute S: SAS Institute Inc. In / . Edited by Documentation SHa, 9.3 edn. Cary, NC, USA; 2011.
  
• 刊物主题：Veterinary Medicine; Zoology; Transgenics;
• 出版者：BioMed Central
• ISSN：1746-6148

文摘

Background Quantification of pain plays a vital role in the diagnosis and management of pain in animals. In order to refine and validate an acute pain scale for horses a prospective, randomized, blinded study was conducted. Twenty-four client owned adult horses were recruited and allocated to one of four following groups: anaesthesia only (GA); pre-emptive analgesia and anaesthesia (GAA,); anaesthesia, castration and postoperative analgesia (GC); or pre-emptive analgesia, anaesthesia and castration (GCA). One investigator, unaware of the treatment group, assessed all horses at time-points before and after intervention and completed the pain scale. Videos were also obtained at these time-points and were evaluated by a further four blinded evaluators who also completed the scale. The data were used to investigate the relevance, specificity, criterion validity and inter- and intra-observer reliability of each item on the pain scale, and to evaluate construct validity and responsiveness of the scale. Results Construct validity was demonstrated by the observed differences in scores between the groups, four hours after anaesthetic recovery and before administration of systemic analgesia in the GC group. Inter- and intra-observer reliability for the items was only satisfactory. Subsequently the pain scale was refined, based on results for relevance, specificity and total item correlation. Conclusions Scale refinement and exclusion of items that did not meet predefined requirements generated a selection of relevant pain behaviours in horses. After further validation for reliability, these may be used to evaluate pain under clinical and experimental conditions.