Bayesian tests for composite alternative hypotheses in cross-tabulated data
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Daniel Yekutieli
  • 关键词:Hypotheses testing ; Simpson’s Paradox ; Composite alternative hypotheses ; Exact tests ; Likelihood ratio tests ; Bayes rules ; Bayes factors ; 62C10 ; 62G10
  • 刊名:TEST
  • 出版年:2015
  • 出版时间:June 2015
  • 年:2015
  • 卷:24
  • 期:2
  • 页码:287-301
  • 全文大小:560 KB
  • 参考文献:Agresti A (2002) Categorical data analysis. Wiley, New Jersey
    Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57:289-00MATH MathSciNet
    Casella G, Berger RL (2001) Statistical inference. Duxbury Press, Belmont
    Efron B, Tibshirani R, Storey JD, Tusher V (2001) Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. J Am Stat Assoc 96:1151-160View Article MATH MathSciNet
    Heller R, Yekutieli D (2014) Replicability analysis for genome-wide association studies. Ann Appl Stat 8:481-98View Article MATH MathSciNet
    Kass RE, Raftery AE (1995) Bayes factors. J Am Stat Assoc 90:773-95View Article MATH
    Storey JD (2007) The optimal discovery procedure: a new approach to simultaneous significance testing. J R Stat Soc B 69:347-68View Article MathSciNet
    Sun W, Cai TT (2007) Oracle and adaptive compound decision rules for false discovery rate control. J Am Stat Assoc 102:901-12View Article MATH MathSciNet
  • 作者单位:Daniel Yekutieli (1)

    1. Department of Statistics and OR, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel
  • 刊物类别:Mathematics and Statistics
  • 刊物主题:Statistics
    Statistics
    Statistical Theory and Methods
    Statistics for Business, Economics, Mathematical Finance and Insurance
  • 出版者:Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
  • ISSN:1863-8260
文摘
We present a methodology for constructing significance tests for “difficult-composite alternative hypotheses that have no natural test statistic. We apply our methodology to construct exact tests for cross-tabulated data, and our motivating example is constructing a test for discovering Simpson’s Paradox. Our tests are Bayesian extensions of the likelihood ratio test; they are optimal with respect to the prior distribution and are also closely related to Bayes factors and Bayesian FDR controlling testing procedures.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700