Experimental research on the influence of the jet parameters of minimum quantity lubrication on the lubricating property of Ni-based alloy grinding

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Dongzhou Jia ; Changhe Li ; Yanbin Zhang…
• 关键词：Nanoparticle ; Nanofluids ; MQL grinding ; Air pressure ; Gas–liquid ratio ; Liquid flow rate ; Specific tangential grinding force ; Specific grinding energy ; Coefficient of friction ; Droplet size ; Droplet velocity
• 刊名：The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：January 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：82
• 期：1-4
• 页码：617-630
• 全文大小：3,028 KB
• 参考文献：1.Xu X, Malkin S (2001) Comparison of methods to measure grinding temperatures. J Manuf Sci Eng 123(2):191–195CrossRef
  2.Guo C, Shi Z, Attia H, McIntosh D (2007) Power and wheel wear for grinding nickel alloy with plated CBN wheels. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 56(1):343–346CrossRef
  3.Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST (2012) Environmentally conscious machining of difficult-to-machine materials with regard to cutting fluids. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 57:83–101CrossRef
  4.Heinemann R, Hinduja S, Barrow G, Petuelli G (2006) Effect of MQL on the tool life of small twist drills in deep-hole drilling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(1):1–6CrossRef
  5.Jia DZ, Li CH, Zhang DK, Wang S, Hou YL (2014) Investigation into the formation mechanism and distribution characteristics of suspended microparticles in MQL grinding. Recent Patents Mech Eng 7(1):52–62CrossRef
  6.Gviniashvili V, Webster J, Rowe B (2005) Fluid flow and pressure in the grinding wheel-workpiece interface. Trans ASME 127(1):198–205CrossRef
  7.Hafenbraedl D, Malkin S (2000) Environmentally-conscious minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) for internal cylindrical grinding. Trans NAMRI/SME 28:149–154
  8.Sadeghi MH, Haddad MJ, Tawakoli T, Emami M (2009) Minimal quantity lubrication-MQL in grinding of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44(5–6):487–500CrossRef
  9.Mao C, Huang Y, Zhou X, Gan H, Zhang J, Zhou Z (2014) The tribological properties of nanofluid used in minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(1):1221–1228CrossRef
  10.Malkin S, Guo C (2007) Thermal analysis of grinding. CIRP Ann 56(2):760–782CrossRef
  11.Jin T, Stephenson DJ (2008) A study of the convection heat transfer coefficients of grinding fluids. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):367–370CrossRef
  12.Silva LR, Bianchi EC, Catai RE, Fusse RY, Franc TV, Aguiar PR (2001) Study on the behaviour of the minimum quantity lubricant - MQL technique under different lubricating and cooling conditions when grinding ABNT4340 steel. J Braz Sci Mech Sci Eng 2:192–199
  13.Silva LR, Bianchi EC, Fusse RY, Catai RE, Franc TV, Aguiar PR (2007) Analysis of surface integrity for minimum quantity lubricant—MQL in grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(2):412–418CrossRef
  14.Weinert K, Inasaki I, Sutherland JW, Wakabayashi T (2004) Dry machining and minimum quantity lubrication. Ann CIRP 53(2):323–349CrossRef
  15.Pei HJ, Zhang CY, Zhang WW (2007) MQL machining trace cooling lubrication system. China's Manuf Ind Inf 36(19):136–142
  16.Morgan MN, Barczak L, Batako A (2012) Temperatures in fine grinding with minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60(9–12):951–958CrossRef
  17.Heisel U, Lutz D, Wassmer R, Walter U (1998) The minimum quantity lubricant technique and its application in the cutting process. Mach Met Mag 386:22–38
  18.Barczak LM, Batako ADL, Morgan MN (2010) A study of plane surface grinding under minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) conditions. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(11):977–985CrossRef
  19.Tosun N, Pihtili H (2010) Gray relational analysis of performance characteristics in MQL milling of 7075 Al alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46(5–8):509–516CrossRef
  20.Mohsen E, Mohammad HS, Ahmed ADS, Farshid H (2014) Investigating the minimum quantity lubrication in grinding of Al2O3 engineering ceramic. J Cleaner Prod 66(1):632–643
  21.Rabiei F, Rahimi AR, Hadad MJ, Ashrafijou M (2015) Performance improvement of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) technique in surface grinding by modeling and optimization. J Cleaner Prod 86:447–460CrossRef
  22.Han ZL, Li CH (2010) The summarize of grinding fluid application methods. Abrasives Commun 10:7–12
  23.Wen D, Lin G, Vafaei S, Zhang K (2009) Review of nanofluids for heat transfer applications. Particuology 7(2):141–150CrossRef
  24.Ahmed ADS, Sayuti M, Hamdi M (2012) Reduction of power and lubricant oil consumption in milling process using a new SiO2 nanolubrication system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63(5–8):505–512
  25.Zhang Q, Li CH, Wang S (2013) Analysis of cooling characteristic for minimum quantity lubrication with nanoparticles. Manuf Tech Mac Tool 3:91–96
  26.Choi C, Jung M, Choi Y, Lee J, Oh J (2011) Tribological properties of lubricating oil-based nanofluids with metal/carbon nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 11(1):368–371CrossRef
  27.Hwang Y, Park HS, Lee JK, Jung WH (2006) Thermal conductivity and lubrication characteristics of nanofluids. Curr Appl Phys 6:67–71CrossRef
  28.Rahmati B, Sarhan AAD, Sayuti M (2014) Investigating the optimum molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanolubrication parameters in CNC milling of AL6061-T6 alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(5–8):1143–1155CrossRef
  29.Kalita P, Malshe AP, Arun Kumar S, Yoganath VG, Gurumurthy T (2012) Study of specific energy and coefficient of friction coefficient in minimum quantity lubrication grinding using oil-based nanolubricants. J Manuf Process 14(2):160–166CrossRef
  30.Lee PH, Nam TS, Li C, Lee SW (2010) Environmentally-friendly nano-fluid minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) meso-scale grinding process using nano-diamond particles. Manuf Autom (ICMA) Int Conf IEEE 44–49
  31.Jia D, Li C, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Zhang X (2014) Experimental verification of nanoparticle jet minimum quantity lubrication effectiveness in grinding. J Nanoparticle Res 16(12):1–15MathSciNet CrossRef
  32.Mao C, Tang X, Zou H, Huang X, Zhou Z (2012) Investigation of grinding characteristic using nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13(10):1745–1752CrossRef
  33.Zhang HL, Zhou S, Chen CB (2012) Experimental study on the tribological properties of WS2 and MoS2 nano-particles as lubricating oil additives. Pet Process Petrochem 43(9):71–75
  34.Shen B, Shih AJ, Tung SC (2008) Application of nanofluids in minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Tribol Trans 51(6):730–737CrossRef
  35.Zhang YB, Li CH, Jia DZ, Zhang DK, Zhang XW (2014) Experimental evaluation of MoS2 nanoparticles in jet MQL grinding with different types of vegetable oil as base oil. J Cleaner Prod 87:930–940MathSciNet CrossRef
  36.Wang S, Li CH, Zhang DK, Jia DZ, Zhang YB (2014) Modeling the operation of a common grinding wheel with nanoparticle jet flow minimal quantity lubrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74(5–8):835–850CrossRef
  37.Hou YL, Li CH, Zhang DK, Jia DZ, Wang S (2014) Grinding temperature with nanoparticle jet minimum quantity lubrication. Recent Patents Mech Eng 7(2):149–161CrossRef
  38.Li CH, Li JY, Wang S, Zhang Q (2013) Modeling and numerical simulation of the grinding temperature field with nanoparticle jet of MQL. Adv Mech Eng Article ID 986984, 9 pages
  39.Li CH, Wang S, Zhang Q, Jia DZ (2013) Evaluation of minimum quantity lubrication grinding with nano-particles and recent related patents. Recent Patents Nanatechnol 7(2):167–181CrossRef
  40.Liu ZR (2010) The research of heat transfer theory by nanofluids jet lubrication and the evaluation of the surface integrity in grinding. Qingdao Technological University, Shandong
  41.Li JY (2012) The simulation and experimental investigation on grinding heat by nanofluids jet lubrication. Qingdao Technological University, Shandong
  42.Wang S (2013) Generating mechanism and experimental investigation on surface topography in the grinding process using MQL by nanopaticles jet. Qingdao Technological University, Shangdong
  43.Guo C, Malkin S (1996) Inverse heat transfer analysis of grinding, part 1: methods. J Eng Ind 118(1):137–141CrossRef
  44.Engineer E, Guo C, Malkin S (1992) Experimental measurement of fluid flow through the grinding zone. J Eng Ind 114(1):61–66
  45.Ebbrell S, Woolley NH, Tridimas YD, Allanson DR, Rowe WB (2000) The effects of cutting fluid application methods on the grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(2):209–223CrossRef
  46.Kaliszer H, Trmal G (1975) Mechanics of grinding fluid delivery. SME Tech. Paper
  47.Hryniewicz P, Szeri AZ, Jahanmir S (2001) Application of lubrication theory to fluid flow in grinding: part I—flow between smooth surfaces. J Tribol 123(1):94–100CrossRef
  48.Lee PH, Nam JS, Li C, Lee SW (2012) An experimental study on micro-grinding process with nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13(3):331–338CrossRef
  49.Mao C, Zou H, Huang X, Zhang J, Zhou Z (2013) The influence of spraying parameters on grinding performance for nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64(9–12):1791–1799CrossRef
  50.Hadad M, Sadeghi B (2013) Minimum quantity lubrication-MQL turning of AISI 4140 steel alloy. J Cleaner Prod 54:332–343CrossRef
  51.Gong YD, Wang WS, Yu CZ (2007) The influence factors analysis and research of wheel airflow field based on Ultra-high speed grinding. ASiS-III of ten provinces Mech Eng Soc BBS Heilongjiang province Mech Eng Soc Annu Conf 2007 collected papers (abstract)
  52.Xiu SC, Li CH, Pang ZR, Cai GQ (2007) The liquid jet characteristics and limit position of nozzle of quick point grinding. J Northeastern Univ 28(3):393–396
  53.Li CH, Liu XL, Hou YL, Cai GQ (2007) The dynamic pressure simulation research of abrasive fluid in the grinding zone. Lubr Sealing 32(10):59–61
  54.Zhang DK, Li CH, Zhang YB, Jia DZ, Zhang XW (2015) Experimental research on the energy ratio coefficient and specific grinding energy in nanoparticle jet MQL grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(5–8):1275–1288CrossRef
  55.Zhang DK, Li CH, Jia DZ, Zhang YB, Zhang XW (2015) Specific grinding energy and surface roughness of nanoparticle jet minimum quantity lubrication in grinding. Chin J Aeronaut 28(2):570–581CrossRef
  56.Li CH, Zhang XW, Zhang Q, Wang S, Zhang DK, Jia DZ, Zhang YB (2014) Modeling and simulation of useful fluid flow rate in grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(9–12):1587–1604CrossRef
  57.Debnath S, Reddy MM, Yi QS (2014) Environmental friendly cutting fluids and cooling techniques in machining: a review. J Cleaner Prod 83:33–47CrossRef
  58.Lawal SA, Choudhury IA, Nukman Y (2013) A critical assessment of lubrication techniques in machining processes: a case for minimum quantity lubrication using vegetable oil-based lubricant. J Cleaner Prod 41:210–221CrossRef
  59.Jia DZ (2014) Lubrication mechanism and experimental study of fluid field characteristics under grinding using MQL by nanoparticles jet. Qingdao Technological University, Shangdong
  60.Qiao YL (2005) Lubrication and self-healing techniques of the nanoparticles. National defence industry press, Beijing
  61.Tawakoli T, Hadad MJ, Sadeghi MH (2010) Influence of oil mist parameters on minimum quantity lubrication–MQL grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(6):521–531CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Dongzhou Jia (1)
  Changhe Li (1)
  Yanbin Zhang (1)
  Dongkun Zhang (1)
  Xiaowei Zhang (1)
  
  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Qingdao Technological University, 266033, Qingdao, China
  
• 刊物类别：Engineering
• 刊物主题：Industrial and Production Engineering
  Production and Logistics
  Mechanical Engineering
  Computer-Aided Engineering and Design
  
• 出版者：Springer London
• ISSN：1433-3015

文摘

Based on research on nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) in grinding, a plane grinding experiment was performed on Ni-based alloy using a K-P36 precision numerical control surface grinder. Uniform grinding parameters were used in the experiment, but three groups of MQL jet parameters were changed. The grinding force was measured using a YDM-III99 three-dimensional dynamometer to calculate the specific grinding energy and coefficient of friction. The surface roughness of the workpiece was measured using a TIME3220 roughness tester. An experimental research was also conducted on the droplet size and velocity of the jet using a high-speed camera system. Results showed that the most ideal lubricating effect was achieved under 0.5 MPa compressed gas, 0.4 gas–liquid ratio, and 0.005 kg/s liquid flow rate. Under the best jet flow condition, the specific tangential grinding force, specific grinding energy, and coefficient of friction were 1.45 N/mm, 74.57 J/mm3, and 0.414, respectively. The surface roughness of the workpiece was at its most ideal at this point, where Ra, Rz, and RSm were 0.249 μm, 1.972 μm, and 0.028 mm, respectively. Based on high-speed continuous shooting at the jet, the mean droplet size was about 171.82 μm under the optimum jet parameters, and the droplets exhibited variable accelerations at a high accelerated velocity (>500 m/s2). Keywords Nanoparticle Nanofluids MQL grinding Air pressure Gas–liquid ratio Liquid flow rate Specific tangential grinding force Specific grinding energy Coefficient of friction Droplet size Droplet velocity