Parents' Experience with Pediatric Microarray: Transferrable Lessons in the Era of Genomic Counseling

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：R. Z. Hayeems ; R. Babul-Hirji ; N. Hoang ; R. Weksberg…
• 关键词：Microarray ; Parental experience ; Personal utility ; Uncertainty ; Qualitative
• 刊名：Journal of Genetic Counseling
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：April 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：25
• 期：2
• 页码：298-304
• 全文大小：387 KB
• 参考文献：Austin, J., Semaka, A., & Hadjipavlou, G. (2014). Conceptualizing genetic counseling as psychotherapy in the era of genomic medicine. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(6), 903–909. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-014-9728-1 .CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
  Biesecker, L. G., Burke, W., Kohane, I., Plon, S. E., & Zimmern, R. (2012). Next-generation sequencing in the clinic: are we ready? Nature Reviews Genetics, 13(11), 818–824. doi:10.​1038/​nrg3357 .CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
  Bunnik, E. M., Janssens, A. C., & Schermer, M. H. (2014). Personal utility in genomic testing: is there such a thing? Journal of Medical Ethics.
  Caulfield, T., Evans, J., McGuire, A., McCabe, C., Bubela, T., Cook-Deegan, R., Fishman, J., Hogarth, S., Miller, F. A., Ravitsky, V., Biesecker, B., Borry, P., Cho, M. K., Carroll, J. C., Etchegary, H., Joly, Y., Kato, K., Soo-Jin Lee, S., Rothenberg, K., Sankar, P., Szego, M. J., Ossorio, P., Pullman, D., Rousseau, F., Ungar, W. J., & Wilson, B. (2013). Reflections on the cost of “low-cost” whole genome sequencing: framing the health policy debate. PLoS Biology, 11(11), e1001699. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pbio.​1001699 .CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
  Clarke, E., Combs, R., Black, G., & Hall, G. (2015). Patient expectations and attitudes towards specialist genetic eye services. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24(2), 349–357. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-014-9775-7 .CrossRef PubMed
  Condit, C. M., & Shen, L. (2011). Public understanding of risks from gene-environment interaction in common diseases: implications for public communications. Public Health Genomics, 14(2), 115–124. doi:10.​1159/​000314915 .CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
  Darilek, S., Ward, P., Pursley, A., Plunkett, K., Furman, P., Magoulas, P., Patel, A., Cheung, S. W., & Eng, C. M. (2008). Pre- and postnatal genetic testing by array-comparative genomic hybridization: genetic counseling perspectives. Genetics in Medicine, 10(1), 13–18. doi:10.​1097/​GIM.​0b013e31815f1ddb​ .CrossRef PubMed
  Foster, M. W., Mulvihill, J. J., & Sharp, R. R. (2009). Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information. Genetics in Medicine, 11(8), 570–574. doi:10.​1097/​GIM.​0b013e3181a2743e​ .CrossRef PubMed
  Graungaard, A. H., & Skov, L. (2007). Why do we need a diagnosis? A qualitative study of parents’ experiences, coping and needs, when the newborn child is severely disabled. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33(3), 296–307.
  Grosse, S. D., Kalman, L., & Khoury, M. J. (2010). Evaluation of the validity and utility of genetic testing for rare diseases. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 686, 115–131. doi:10.​1007/​978-90-481-9485-8_​8 .CrossRef PubMed
  Hallberg, U., Oskarsdottir, S., & Klingberg, G. (2010). 22q11 deletion syndrome—the meaning of a diagnosis. A qualitative study on parental perspectives. Child: Care, Health and Development, 36(5), 719–725. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1365-2214.​2010.​01108.​x .
  Khan, C. M., Rini, C., Bernhardt, B. A., Roberts, J. S., Christensen, K. D., Evans, J. P., Brothers, K. B., Roche, M. I., Berg, J. S., & Henderson, G. E. (2014). How can psychological science inform research about genetic counseling for clinical genomic sequencing? Journal of Genetic Counseling. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-014-9804-6 .PubMed PubMedCentral
  Lautenbach, D. M., Christensen, K. D., Sparks, J. A., & Green, R. C. (2013). Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 14, 491–513. doi:10.​1146/​annurev-genom-092010-110722 .CrossRef PubMed
  Lofland, J. (1976). Developing disciplined abstractions. In Doing social life: The qualitative study of human interaction in natural settings (pp. 62). New York: Wiley.
  Maheu, C., & Thorne, S. (2008). Receiving inconclusive genetic test results: an interpretive description of the BRCA1/2 experience. Research in Nursing & Health, 31(6), 553–562. doi:10.​1002/​nur.​20286 .CrossRef
  Makela, N. L., Birch, P. H., Friedman, J. M., & Marra, C. A. (2009). Parental perceived value of a diagnosis for intellectual disability (ID): a qualitative comparison of families with and without a diagnosis for their child’s ID. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 149A(11), 2393–2402. doi:10.​1002/​ajmg.​a.​33050 .CrossRef PubMed
  O’Rourke, P. P. (2013). Genomic medicine: too great expectations? Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 94(2), 188–190. doi:10.​1038/​clpt.​2013.​44 .CrossRef PubMed
  Reiff, M., Bernhardt, B. A., Mulchandani, S., Soucier, D., Cornell, D., Pyeritz, R. E., & Spinner, N. B. (2012). “What does it mean?”: uncertainties in understanding results of chromosomal microarray testing. Genetics in Medicine, 14(2), 250–258. doi:10.​1038/​gim.​2011.​52 .CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
  Schmidlen, T. J., Wawak, L., Kasper, R., Garcia-Espana, J. F., Christman, M. F., & Gordon, E. S. (2014). Personalized genomic results: analysis of informational needs. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(4), 578–587. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-014-9693-8 .CrossRef PubMed
  Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
  Thorne, S., Kirkham, S. R., & MacDonald-Emes, J. (1997). Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Research in Nursing & Health, 20(2), 169–177. doi:10.​1002/​(SICI)1098-240X(199704)20:​2<169:​:​AID-NUR9>3.​0.​CO;2-I .CrossRef
  Timmermans, S., & Buchbinder, M. (2010). Patients-in-waiting: living between sickness and health in the genomics era. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(4), 408–423. doi:10.​1177/​0022146510386794​ .CrossRef PubMed
  Tluczek, A., Chevalier McKechnie, A., & Lynam, P. A. (2010). When the cystic fibrosis label does not fit: a modified uncertainty theory. Qualitative Health Research, 20(2), 209–223. doi:10.​1177/​1049732309356285​ .CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
  Trakadis, Y., & Shevell, M. (2011). Microarray as a first genetic test in global developmental delay: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 53(11), 994–999. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1469-8749.​2011.​04080.​x .CrossRef PubMed
  Wicklund, C., & Trepanier, A. (2014). Adapting genetic counseling training to the genomic era: more an evolution than a revolution. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(4), 452–454. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-014-9690-y .CrossRef PubMed
  
• 作者单位：R. Z. Hayeems (1) (2) (4)
  R. Babul-Hirji (3) (5) (7)
  N. Hoang (3) (5)
  R. Weksberg (3) (5) (6) (7)
  C. Shuman (3) (4) (5) (7)
  
  1. Program in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
  2. Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  4. Centre for Genetic Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
  3. Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
  5. Program in Genetics and Genomic Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
  7. Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  6. Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  
• 刊物类别：Biomedical and Life Sciences
• 刊物主题：Biomedicine
  Human Genetics
  Public Health
  Clinical Psychology
  Gynecology
  Ethics
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1573-3599

文摘

Advances in genome-based microarray and sequencing technologies hold tremendous promise for understanding, better-managing and/or preventing disease and disease-related risk. Chromosome microarray technology (array based comparative genomic hybridization [aCGH]) is widely utilized in pediatric care to inform diagnostic etiology and medical management. Less clear is how parents experience and perceive the value of this technology. This study explored parents’ experiences with aCGH in the pediatric setting, focusing on how they make meaning of various types of test results. We conducted in-person or telephone-based semi-structured interviews with parents of 21 children who underwent aCGH testing in 2010. Transcripts were coded and analyzed thematically according to the principles of interpretive description. We learned that parents expect genomic tests to be of personal use; their experiences with aCGH results characterize this use as intrinsic in the test’s ability to provide a much sought-after answer for their child’s condition, and instrumental in its ability to guide care, access to services, and family planning. In addition, parents experience uncertainty regardless of whether aCGH results are of pathogenic, uncertain, or benign significance; this triggers frustration, fear, and hope. Findings reported herein better characterize the notion of personal utility and highlight the pervasive nature of uncertainty in the context of genomic testing. Empiric research that links pre-test counseling content and psychosocial outcomes is warranted to optimize patient care.