Special issue on “Cultural and cognitive dimensions of innovation-edited by Petra Ahrweiler and Riccardo Viale

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Petra Ahrweiler (1)
  
• 关键词：Cognitive and social dimensions ; Knowledge production ; Innovation networks ; Science and technology studies
• 刊名：Mind & Society
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：June 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：12
• 期：1
• 页码：5-10
• 全文大小：124KB
• 参考文献：1. Ahrweiler P (ed) (2010) Innovation in complex social systems. Routledge, London
  2. Blalock HM (1969) Theory construction. From verbal to mathematical formulations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
  3. Bloor D (1976) Knowledge and social imagery. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
  4. Elzinga A (1997) The science-society contract in historical transformation: with special reference to epistemic drift. Soc Sci Inf 36(3):411-45 CrossRef
  5. Etzkowitz H, Webster A, Gebhardt C und Terra B (1998) The Future of the University and the University of the Future Triple Helix Conference 1998, Internet Manuskript
  6. Fagerberg J, Mowery D, Nelson RR (2006) The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford CrossRef
  7. Funtowicz S, Ravetz O (1993) The emergence of post-normal science. In: von Schomberg R (ed) Science, politics and moraliyt. Scientific uncertainty and decision making. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 85-23
  8. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London
  9. Knorr Cetina K (1981) The manufacture of knowledge. An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Pergamon Press, Oxford
  10. Knorr Cetina K (1989) Spielarten des Konstruktivismus. In: Soziale Welt 40 1, 2, pp 86-6
  11. Kowol U and Krohn W (1995) Innovationsnetzwerke. Ein Modell der Technikgenese. In: Halfmann J, Bechmann G und Rammert W (eds) Technik und Gesellschaft. Jahrbuch 8, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/M, pp 77-04
  12. Lakatos I (1970) Falsification and the Methodology of scientific Research Programmes. In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A (eds) Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 91-96
  13. Lakoff G (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago CrossRef
  14. Laudan L (1990) Science and relativism. Some key controversies in the philosophy of science. Chicago University Press, Chicago
  15. Mannheim K (1969) Ideologie und utopie, 5th edn. Schulte-Bulmke, Frankfurt/M
  16. Nicholas JM (1984) Scientific and other Interests. In: Brown JR et al (eds) Scientific rationality. The sociological turn. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 265-94
  17. Pickering A (1992) From science as knowledge to science as practice. In: Pickering A (ed) Science as practice and culture. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 139-62 CrossRef
  18. Schumpeter J (1912) The theory of economic development. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  19. Schütz A (1974) Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M
  20. Weingart P (1997) Neue Formen der Wissensproduktion. Fakt, Fiktion und Mode, IWT Paper 15, April 1997
  21. Ziman J (1996) Postacademic science: constructing knowledge with networks and norms. Sci Stud 9(1):67-0
  
• 作者单位：Petra Ahrweiler (1)
  
  1. Europ?ische Akademie zur Erforschung von Folgen, Wissenschaftlich-technischer Entwicklungen Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler GmbH, Wilhelmstr. 56, 53474, Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler, Germany
  

文摘

The Special Issue is started with the observation that the tension of mind and society, i.e. cognitive and sociological/cultural dimensions in knowledge production and innovation, is a well-known topic of academic discourse in Science and Technology Studies. The introduction mentions some historical hallmarks of the involved perspectives and discussions to outline the background of the Special Issue. The purpose of its contributions, which are briefly presented at the end of the introduction, is to review this long-existing tension of cognitive and cultural dimensions in knowledge production and innovation in the light of the cognitive and societal changes that have just begun and will have a huge impact in the future.