Innovation networks

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Petra Ahrweiler (1)
  Mark T. Keane (2)
  
• 关键词：Innovation ; Creativity ; Networks ; Knowledge production ; Society
• 刊名：Mind & Society
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：June 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：12
• 期：1
• 页码：73-90
• 全文大小：578KB
• 参考文献：1. Ahrweiler P (ed) (2010) Innovation in complex social systems. Routledge, London
  2. Ahrweiler P, Pyka A, Gilbert N (2011a) A new model for university–industry links in knowledge-based economies. J Prod Innovat Manag 28:218-35 CrossRef
  3. Ahrweiler P, Gilbert N, Pyka A (2011b) Agency and structure: a social simulation of knowledge-intensive industries. Comput Math Organ Theory 17(1):59-6 CrossRef
  4. Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation. Adm Sci Q 45:425-55 CrossRef
  5. Albert R, Barabási A-L (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys T4(1):47-7 CrossRef
  6. Assimakopoulos D (2007) Technological communities and networks: triggers and drivers for innovation. Routledge, London CrossRef
  7. Barabási A-L, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286:509-12 CrossRef
  8. Beije P (1998) Technological change in the modern economy: basic topics and new developments. Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham
  9. Bozeman B, Lee S (2005) The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Soc Sci Stud 35(5):673-02 CrossRef
  10. Brass DJ, Galaskiewicz J, Greve HR, Wenpin T (2004) Taking stock of networks and organizations: a multilevel perspective. Acad Manage J 47:795-17 CrossRef
  11. Burt RS (1992) Structural holes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
  12. Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Am J Sociol 110:349-99 CrossRef
  13. Costello FJ, Keane MT (2000) Efficient creativity: constraint guided conceptual combination. Cognit Sci 24:299-49 CrossRef
  14. Cowan R, Jonard N, Zimmermann JB (2007) Bilateral collaboration and the emergence of innovation networks. Manage Sci 53:1051-067 CrossRef
  15. European Commission (2002) Benchmarking national research policies: the impact of RTD on competitiveness and employment (IRCSE). European Commission, Brussels
  16. European Commission (2008) Science, technology and innovation in Europe. European Commission, Brussels
  17. Eysenck MW, Keane MT (2005) Cognitive psychology: a student’s handbook, 5th edn. Taylor Francis, London
  18. Eysenck MW, Keane MT (2010) Cognitive psychology: a student’s handbook, 6th edn. Taylor Francis, London
  19. Fagerberg J (2003) Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature. J Evol Econ 13:125-59 CrossRef
  20. Fagerberg J, Mowery D, Nelson RR (2006) The oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford CrossRef
  21. Fleming L, Marx M (2006) Managing creativity in a small world. Calif Manag Rev 48:6-7 CrossRef
  22. Fornahl F, Brenner T (2003) Cooperation, networks and institutions in regional innovation systems. Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham
  23. Galison P (1997) Image and logic: a material culture of microphysics. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  24. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London
  25. Gloor P (2006) Swarm creativity: competitive advantage through collaborative innovation networks. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  26. Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78:1360-380 CrossRef
  27. Haas P (1992) Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int Org 46:1-5 CrossRef
  28. Halvey M, Keane MT, Smyth B (2006) Mobile web surfing is the same as Web surfing. Commun ACM 49:76-1 CrossRef
  29. Imai K, Baba Y (1991) Systemic innovation and cross-border networks, transcending markets and hierarchies to create a new techno-economic system. Technology and productivity: the challenge for economic policy. OECD Publishing, Paris
  30. Keane MT (2010) Creativity: a gap analysis. In: Proceedings of international conference on cognition, experience, and creativity. IIT Gandhinagar, India
  31. Keane MT, Ledgeway T, Duff S (1994) Constraints on analogical mapping: a comparison of three models. Cognit Sci 18:387-38 CrossRef
  32. Koenig MD, Battiston S, Schweitzer F (2009) Modeling evolving innovation networks. In: Pyka A, Scharnhorst A (eds) Innovation networks: new approaches in modeling and analyzing. Springer, Berlin, pp 187-67
  33. Koschatzky K, Kulicke M, Zenker A (eds) (2001) Innovation networks: concepts and challenges in the European perspective. Springer, Heidelberg
  34. Krohn W (1995) Die Innovationschancen partizipatorischer Technikgestaltung und diskursiver Konfliktregelung. IWT-Paper 9/95, Bielefeld. The innovation chances of participatory technology shaping and discursive conflict resolution (own translation where cited)
  35. Krueger J, Cantner U, Ebersberger B, Hanusch H, Pyka A (2004) Twin peaks in national income: parametric and nonparametric estimates. Rev Econ 55:1127-144
  36. Leydesdorff L, Rotolo D, Nooy de W (2012) Innovation as a nonlinear process, the scientometric perspective, and the specification of an “Innovation Opportunities Explorer- Digit Libr. http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.6235
  37. Luhmann N (1987) Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt. Social systems. Foundation of a general theory (own translation where cited)
  38. Lundvall B? (ed) (1992) National innovation systems: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, London
  39. Malerba F (2002) Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Res Policy 31:247-64 CrossRef
  40. Marquis C, Lounsbury M, Greenwood R (eds) (2011) Communities and organizations. Res Sociol Organ 33:1-63
  41. Merton RK (1970) Science, technology and society in seventeenth-century England. Harper & Row, New York
  42. Nelson RR (ed) (1993) National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. University Press, Oxford
  43. Newman M (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45:167-56 CrossRef
  44. OECD (2009a) Policy responses to the economic Crisis: investing in innovation for long-term growth. OECD Publishing, Paris
  45. OECD (2009b) Interim report on the OECD innovation strategy. OECD Publishing, Paris
  46. Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2007) Evolution and structure of the internet. A statistical physics approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  47. Porter KA, Bunker-Whittington KC, Powell WW (2005) The institutional embeddedness of high-tech regions: relational foundations of the Boston biotechnology community. In: Breschi S, Malerba F (eds) Clusters, networks, and innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  48. Powell WW, White DR, Koput K, Owen-Smith J (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: the growth of inter-organizational collaboration in the life sciences. Am J Sociol 110:1132-205 CrossRef
  49. Pyka A, H?rlesberger M (2004) A neurological view on the technological brain of a firm. Austrian Research Centers, Mimeo
  50. Pyka A, Kueppers G (eds) (2003) Innovation networks: theory and practice. Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham
  51. Pyka A, Scharnhorst A (eds) (2009) Innovation networks. New approaches in modeling and analyzing. Springer, Berlin
  52. Pyka A, Gilbert N, Ahrweiler P (2007) Simulating knowledge generation and distribution processes in innovation collaborations and networks. Cybern Syst 38:667-93 CrossRef
  53. Schilling MA, Phelps CC (2005) Interfirm collaboration networks: the impact of small world connectivity on firm innovation. Manage Sci 53:1113-126 CrossRef
  54. Schumpeter J (1912) The theory of economic development. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  55. Siegel DS, Waldman D, Atwater L, Link AN (2003) Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration. J High Technol Manag Res 14:111-33 CrossRef
  56. Smith HL, Ho K (2006) Measuring the performance of Oxford University, Oxford Brookes University and the government laboratories-spin-off companies- Res Policy 35:1554-568 CrossRef
  57. Sorenson O, Rivkin J, Fleming L (2006) Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Res Policy 35:994-017 CrossRef
  58. Thursby J, Kemp S (2002) Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Res Policy 31:109-24 CrossRef
  59. Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in inter-firm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm Sci Q 42:35-7 CrossRef
  60. Verspagen B, Duysters G (2004) The small worlds of strategic technology alliances. Technovation 24:563-71 CrossRef
  61. Vos R, Rikken F (1998) Connecting dis-connected structures: the modeling of scientific discovery in medical literature databases. In: Ahrweiler P, Gilbert N (eds) Computer simulations in science and technology studies. Springer, New York, pp 91-01 CrossRef
  62. Walker G, Kogut B, Shan W (1997) Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organ Sci 8:108-25 CrossRef
  63. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CrossRef
  64. Watts D (1999) Small worlds. Princeton University Press, Princeton
  65. Watts D, Strogatz S (1998) Collective dynamics of “small-world-networks. Nature 393:440-42 CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Petra Ahrweiler (1)
  Mark T. Keane (2)
  
  1. Innovation Research Unit (IRU), Complex Adaptive Systems Laboratory CASL, University College Dublin, 8 Belfield Office Park, Beaver Row, Clonskeagh, Dublin 4, Ireland
  2. Chair of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
  

文摘

This paper advances a framework for modeling the component interactions between cognitive and social aspects of scientific creativity and technological innovation. Specifically, it aims to characterize Innovation Networks; those networks that involve the interplay of people, ideas and organizations to create new, technologically feasible, commercially-realizable products, processes and organizational structures. The tri-partite framework captures networks of ideas (Concept Level), people (Individual Level) and social structures (Social-Organizational Level) and the interactions between these levels. At the concept level, new ideas are the nodes that are created and linked, kept open for further investigation or closed if solved by actors at the individual or organizational levels. At the individual level, the nodes are actors linked by shared worldviews (based on shared professional, educational, experiential backgrounds) who are the builders of the concept level. At the social-organizational level, the nodes are organizations linked by common efforts on a given project (e.g., a company–university collaboration) that by virtue of their intellectual property or rules of governance constrain the actions of individuals (at the Individual Level) or ideas (at the Concept Level). After describing this framework and its implications we paint a number of scenarios to flesh out how it can be applied.