Spatio-temporal distribution patterns of three stream-dwelling freshwater mussel species: towards a strategy for representative surveys
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Alexandra Zieritz (1) (3)
Juergen Geist (1)
Bernhard Gum (1) (2) - 关键词：Burrowing behaviour ; MARK analysis ; Monitoring ; Movement behaviour ; Population survey ; Unionidae
- 刊名：Hydrobiologia
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：September 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：735
- 期：1
- 页码：123-136
- 全文大小：
- 参考文献：1. Allen, D. C. & C. C. Vaughn, 2009. Burrowing behavior of freshwater mussels in experimentally manipulated communities. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28(1): 93-00. CrossRef
2. Altmueller, R. & R. Dettmer, 2006. Erfolgreiche Artenschutzma?nahmen für die Flussperlmuschel / Margaritifera margaritifera L. durch Reduzierung von unnatürlichen Feinsedimentfrachten in Flie?gew?ssern -Erfahrungen im Rahmen des Lutterprojekts [in German]. Informationsdienst des Naturschutz Niedersachsen 26: 192-04.
3. Amyot, J.-P. & J. A. Downing, 1991. Endo- and epibenthic distribution of the unionid mollusc / Elliptio complanata. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 10(3): 280-85. CrossRef
4. Amyot, J.-P. & J. A. Downing, 1997. Seasonal variation in vertical and horizontal movement of the freshwater bivalve / Elliptio complanata (Mollusca: bivalvia). Freshwater Biology 37: 345-54. CrossRef
5. Amyot, J.-P. & J. A. Downing, 1998. Locomotion of / Elliptio complanata (Mollusca: Unionidae): a reproductive function? Freshwater Biology 39: 351-58. CrossRef
6. Balfour, D. L. & L. A. Smock, 1995. Distribution, age structure, and movement of the freshwater mussel / Elliptio complanata (Mollusca: Unionidae) in a headwater stream. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 10: 225-68. CrossRef
7. Bogan, A. E., 1993. Freshwater bivalve extinctions (Mollusca: Unionoida): A search for causes. American Zoologist 33: 599-09.
8. Bovjerg, R. V., 1957. Feeding related to mussel activity. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science 64: 650-53.
9. Burla, H., H.-J. Schenker & W. Stahel, 1974. Das Dispersionmuster von Teichmuscheln ( / Anodonta) im Zuerichsee [in German with English abstract]. Oecologia 17: 131-40. CrossRef
10. Burnham, K. P. & D. R. Anderson (eds), 1998. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information Theoretical Approach. Springer, New York.
11. Clark, P. J. & F. C. Evans, 1954. Distance to nearest neighbour as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35: 445-53. CrossRef
12. Cyr, H., 2009. Substrate and fetch affect the emergence of freshwater mussels from lake sediments. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28: 319-30. CrossRef
13. Dickson, T. L., 2000. A comparison of stream segment and quadrat mussel sampling techniques. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 71: 42-9.
14. Engel, H., 1990. Untersuchungen zur Autoekologie von Unio crassus (Phillipson) in Norddeutschland [in German]. Doctoral thesis, Universitaet Hannover.
15. Forstwirtschaft, B. L. W. & B. L. Umwelt, 2006. Erfassung und Bewertung von Arten der FFH Richtlinie in Bayern -Flussperlmuschel ( / Margaritifera margaritifera). 5.
16. Geist, J., 2010. Strategies for the conservation of endangered freshwater pearl mussels ( / Margaritifera margaritifera L.): a synthesis of Conservation Genetics and Ecology. Hydrobiologia 644(1): 69-8. CrossRef
17. Geist, J., 2011. Integrative freshwater ecology and biodiversity conservation. Ecological Indicators 11: 1507-516. CrossRef
18. Geist, J. & K. Auerswald, 2007. Physicochemical stream bed characteristics and recruitment of the freshwater pearl mussel ( / Margaritifera margaritifera). Freshwater Biology 52: 2299-316. CrossRef
19. Gough, H. M., A. M. Gascho-Landis & J. A. Stoeckel, 2012. Behaviour and physiology are linked in the responses of freshwater mussels to drought. Freshwater Biology 57: 2356-366. CrossRef
20. Gum, B., M. Lange & J. Geist, 2011. A critical reflection on the success of rearing and culturing juvenile freshwater mussels with a focus on the endangered freshwater pearl mussel ( / Margaritifera margaritifera L.). Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 21: 743-51. CrossRef
21. Hazay, J., 1881. Die Mollusken-Fauna von Budapest. Malakozoologische Bl?tter 4: 132-08.
22. Hornbach, D. J. & T. Deneka, 1996. A comparison of a qualitative and a quantitative collection method for examining freshwater mussel assemblages. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15: 587-96. CrossRef
23. Hornbach, D. J., M. C. Hove, B. D. Dickinson, K. R. MacGregor & J. R. Medland, 2010. Estimating population size and habitat associations of two federally endangered mussels in the St. Croix River, Minnesota and Wisconsin, USA. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 20(3): 250-60. CrossRef
24. Lebreton, J. D., K. P. Burnham, J. Clobert & D. R. Anderson, 1992. Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs 62: 67-18. CrossRef
25. Lewandowski, K. & A. Stanczykowska, 1975. The occurrence and role of bivalves of the family Unionidae in Mikolajskie Lake Poland. Ekologia Polska 23(2): 317-34.
26. Lewis, J. B. & P. N. Riebel, 1984. The effect of substrate on burrowing in freshwater mussels (Unionidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 62: 2023-025. CrossRef
27. Meador, J. R., J. T. Peterson & J. M. Wisniewski, 2011. An evaluation of the factors influencing freshwater mussel capture probability, survival, and temporary emigration in a large lowland river. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30: 507-21. CrossRef
28. Negishi, J. N., H. Doi, I. Katano & Y. Kayaba, 2011. Seasonally tracking vertical and horizontal distribution of unionid mussels ( / Pronodularia japanensis): implications for agricultural drainage management. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 21(1): 49-6. CrossRef
29. Negus, C. L., 1966. A quantitative study of growth and reproduction of unionid mussels in the River Thames at Reading. Journal of Animal Ecology 35: 513-32. CrossRef
30. ?sterling, M. E., B. L. Arvidsson & L. A. Greenberg, 2010. Habitat degradation and the decline of the threatened mussel / Margaritifera margaritifera: influence of turbidity and sedimentation on the mussel and its host. Journal of Applied Ecology 47(4): 759-68. CrossRef
31. Perles, S. J., A. D. Christian & D. J. Berg, 2003. Vertical migration, orientation, aggregation, and fecundity of the freshwater mussel / Lampsilis siliquoidea. Ohio Journal of Science 103(4): 73-8.
32. Pfeiffer, M. & K.-O. Nagel, 2010. Looking, feeling, digging -strategies and methods for the mapping of the thick-shelled River Mussel. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 42(6): 171-79.
33. Pooler, P. S. & D. R. Smith, 2005. Optimal sampling design for estimating spatial distribution and abundance of a freshwater mussel population. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24(3): 525-37. CrossRef
34. Saarinen, M. & J. Taskinen, 2003. Burrowing and crawling behaviour of three species of Unionidae in Finland. Journal of Molluscan Studies 69: 81-6. CrossRef
35. Schneider, H., 2011. Habitatcharakterisierung funktionaler Bachmuschelvorkommen ( / Unio crassus) in Flie?gew?ssern Bayerns [in German]. MSc thesis, Technische Universit?t München.
36. Schwalb, A. N. & M. T. Pusch, 2007. Horizontal and vertical movements of unionid mussels in a lowland river. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 26: 261-72. CrossRef
37. Smith, D. R., R. F. Villella & D. P. Lemarie, 2001. Survey protocol for assessment of endangered freshwater mussels in the Allegheny River, Pennsylvania. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 20(1): 118-32. CrossRef
38. Smith, D. R., J. T. Rogala, B. R. Gray, S. J. Zigler & T. J. Newton, 2011. Evaluation of single and two-stage adaptive sampling designs for estimation of density and abundance of freshwater mussels in a large river. Rivers Research and Applications 27: 122-33. CrossRef
39. Strayer, D. L. & D. R. Smith, 2003. A guide to sampling freshwater mussel populations. American Fisheries Society Monograph 8: 1-03.
40. Taeubert, J. E., B. Gum & J. Geist, 2012. Host-specificity of the endangered thick-shelled river mussel ( / Unio crassus, Philipsson 1788) and implications for conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 22: 36-6. CrossRef
41. Taurer, M. M. & R. A. Patzner, 2008. Untersuchungen zur Mobilitaet heimischer Grossmuscheln der Familie Unionidae [in German]. Carinthia II 198: 435-48.
42. Troia, M. J. & N. B. Ford, 2010. Notes on habitat and burrowing behavior of / Obovaria jacksoniana (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in the upper Neches River of east Texas. The Texas Journal of Science 62: 195-04.
43. Valovirta, I., 2009. Monitoring of the freshwater pearl mussel ( / Margaritifera margaritifera) in Finland. The Finnish Environment 12: 56-7.
44. Vaughn, C. C. & C. C. Hakenkamp, 2001. The functional role of burrowing bivalves in freshwater ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 46: 1431-446. CrossRef
45. Vicentini, H., 2005. Unusual spurting behaviour of the freshwater mussel / Unio crassus. Journal of Molluscan Studies 71: 409-10. CrossRef
46. Villella, R. F., D. R. Smith & D. P. Lemarié, 2004. Estimating survival and recruitment in a freshwater mussel population using mark-recapture techniques. American Midland Naturalist 151: 114-33. CrossRef
47. Watters, G. T., S. H. O’Dee & S. Chordas, 2001. Patterns of vertical migration in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida). Journal of Freshwater Ecology 16: 541-49. CrossRef
48. White, G. C. & K. P. Burnham, 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46: 120-39. CrossRef
49. Willing, M. J., 2011. Surveys for the Depressed River Mussel / Pseudanodonta complanata at selected locations in Staffordshire A report for The Staffordshire Wildlife Trust. 42.
50. Young, M., L. Hastie & S. Cooksley, 2003. Monitoring the freshwater pearl mussel, / Margaritifera margaritifera conserving Natura 2000 Rivers, Monitoring Series No 2. English Nature, Peterborough. 18.
51. Zajac, K. & T. Zajac, 2011. The role of active individual movement in habitat selection in the endangered freshwater mussel / Unio crassus Philipsson 1788. Journal of Conchology 40: 446-61. - 作者单位：Alexandra Zieritz (1) (3)
Juergen Geist (1)
Bernhard Gum (1) (2)
1. Aquatic Systems Biology Unit, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technische Universit?t München, Mühlenweg 22, 85354, Freising, Germany
3. Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK
2. Fachberatung für Fischerei, Bezirk Oberbayern, Vockestrasse 72, 85540, Haar, Germany - ISSN：1573-5117
文摘
Conservation efforts for freshwater mussels (Unionoida) require a priori assessments of their populations-status quo. Unfortunately, collection of representative census and other data for most European species is currently hampered by an insufficient understanding of inter- and intra-specific variation in distribution patterns. We assessed distribution and movement in three Unio crassus populations and one sympatric population of Anodonta anatina and Unio pictorum, respectively. We surveyed vertical movement across four sediment depths, and horizontal movement by mark-recapture technique in 3-month intervals. For all the populations, movement and the proportion inhabiting surface layers increased considerably from winter to spring/summer. Spatial aggregation levels remained stable for some populations, while others became increasingly randomly distributed during the study. One U. crassus population exhibited elevated mortality and displayed movement rates exceeding twice those of conspecific populations. The visible proportion of U. crassus populations differed by up to 69% between sites. Current monitoring guidelines in Europe often insufficiently account for the extensive inter- and intra-specific differences in spatio-temporal distribution patterns observed. We suggest developing internationally standardised protocols that specify sampling season and methodology. In particular, U. crassus surveys should be restricted to summer months, and hand-sampling is crucial for some populations.